Forged in the Fires of Liberty: The Friendship of Thomas Paine and General Nathanael Greene

by John Dower


By Robert A. Geake

                                                    

Of the many friendships formed during the glorious cause of the American Revolution, few would, on the surface, seem as improbable as that of the late émigré to America and starry-eyed enlightened political philosopher Thomas Paine and the pragmatic, reserved, and ardent military strategist General Nathanael Greene.

Their backgrounds were not only miles apart in distance but upbringing as well. Paine grew up in a thatch-roofed house in a section of Norfolk, England, known as the Wilderness[i], while Greene was raised in the fine colonial Georgian manor built from the well-rooted Rhode Island family’s shipping business.

But the bonds they shared as adults, their passion for American liberty and self-rule, and the morals instilled in them by a Quaker upbringing would remain the strongest threads in the tapestry that events would weave of each life:

 a commonality in working for the greater good, and to give all Americans, including those of color, the rights of life and liberty; and the opportunity to pursue their own happiness.

Thomas Paine had been baptized an Anglican and remained on the church of England's records as such until he departed for America. As a boy, however, he dutifully attended Quaker meetings with his father, Joseph. A keen-eyed, intelligent son of an artisan staymaker, the pious eight-year-old Paine would pen his first literary achievement when he wrote an epitaph for his deceased pet:

     “Here lies the body of John Crow

       Who once was high, but now is low

       Ye brother crows take warning all

       For as you rise, so you must fall”. 

Despite an early penchant for science, Paine's parents' means could support only a limited education, and he received no formal education beyond the age of twelve. As a result, his learning from then on came by his own accord, and through benevolent sponsors, he would acquire as he reached adulthood.

Nathanael Greene, though born in far better circumstances, was raised to be humble, as the Quaker beliefs mandated both in spirit and in dress; and it was to this life that he and his brothers were tethered at the farm of the elder Nathanael Greene. It was a hard life, even for strong, active young men, and among the chores given to the boys through the seasons on the farm, it is plausible that at the age that Paine was mourning his pet, his later friend and brothers were shooting crows above the fields of Potowamut.  

As Nathanael Greene grew into young adulthood, his passion for reading and learning increased, and he sought friends outside the Quaker community to aid in his education. One such benefactor was Newport minister Ezra Stiles of the Second Congregationalist Church. Among the ministries the pastor provided were preaching to smaller congregations in Tiverton and Little Compton; and, as early as 1771,  held separate Bible meetings for members of the black community, as he recorded on February 24, 1772

“In the Evening a very full and serious Meeting of Negroes at my House, perhaps 80 or 90: I discoursed to them on Luke XIV 16, 17, 18, …They sang well. They appeared attentive and much affected; and after I had done, many of them came up to me and thanked me, as they said, for taking so much Care of their souls.”[ii]

The minister encouraged the young Greene and not only advised him spiritually but also introduced him to William Gill and Lindley Murray,  both studying law at Yale University. With the help of these friends, and later, David Howell of Rhode Island College, Greene was able to borrow books and study at will and learn the social graces from these more worldly young men that would enable him to become a gentleman.[iii] 

Greene settled into managing some of the family's affairs, and a house was built for him in Coventry, Rhode Island, above the Pawtuxet River and the family forge he managed. His reputation in the community continued to grow, and in 1770 he was elected to represent the town in the General Assembly. T was during this term of service that events would propel him into the revolutionary upheaval to come.

In the wake of the infamous Gaspe incident, in which a British revenue schooner ran aground and was burned by Providence and Warwick insurgents caused Greene, to seek military training and learn tactical defense from the available books he could find. He began to drill with the Plainfield, Connecticut militia, and in 1773 was called before the elders of his Meetinghouse and expelled from meetings for his participation in military exercises. The following year, he signed a pact with attorney James Mitchell Varnum to form a militia group and petitioned the state to be incorporated as the "Kentish Guard."

As Thomas Paine reached adulthood, his status as an unskilled laborer gave him little choice but to become an apprentice in his Father’s business. He would not break free of these constraints until an opportunity came for him to practice the same craft in London, and then, on January 17, 1757, he signed aboard the British privateer King of Prussia.

This seemingly impulsive act of independence had occurred once before, but his Father had tracked him down soon enough to dissuade him from signing aboard a vessel that was literally shot to pieces the moment she left the channel. This time, it proved to be an act of good fortune, Paine suddenly being part of a crew that captured eight enemy vessels and their treasure in as many months; returning to the London docks in late summer.

It was then that the city itself, with its bookstores and coffeeshops and free lectures, fed again Paine's appetite for learning and increasingly for discourse; with friends he made in the coffeeshops and with printers who would ultimately produce his first pamphlets in defense of workers rights that brought him his first recognition, but it was little comfort for the failure of his own business, and of an impulsive marriage that ended unhappily in the spring of 1774.   

Having sold all his goods, he returned to London and made his way to 36 Craven St. to meet with the Ambassador from North America, Benjamin Franklin. It was an act of uncanny nerve and confidence that Paine would sit down with and obtain a letter of recommendation from one of few celebrities from the colonies that could assist someone like Paine, unlikely as it was that Franklin had heard of the aspiring author.

Paine's biographer, Craig Nelson, assigns their immediate friendship to their common origins of  being born

 “near the bottom rungs of Anglo-American society. Both had acquired an advanced education by their own efforts, and both believed in cultivating an elegant and stylish simplicity as an outward manifestation of republican ideals.”[iv]

But Paine had something more that Franklin and others, including Washington, and  Nathanael Greene, would see: an absolute and sincere belief in the cause of America and of democracy itself for mankind. In the years ahead, the country and lovers of liberty around the world would briefly elevate Thomas Paine to the level of the world’s greatest thinkers. But as he left Franklin’s doorstep, he had but more than a letter of recommendation and his boat ticket to America.

Three months later, after an arduous voyage, Paine was literally carried in a litter ashore at the port of Philadelphia. Sickness had plagued the hold, filled with servants and low-wage workers who could scarcely afford the ticket and the risk of the voyage. The thirty-seven-year-old Paine had been taken with a debilitating illness, quite removed from the rest of the ship. The letter he bore from Franklin saved him, for the lone doctor on the vessel not only saved many of the passengers and crew who had fallen ill but had Thomas Paine taken to his own house and nursed him some six weeks before he was well enough to find his own rooms and his own place in the Revolution that was to come.

Nathanael Greene had suffered setbacks as well. While he was among the founders of the new militia for Kent County, a childhood injury that left him with a slight but permanent limp in his gait now prevented him from being elected commander of the Kentish Guard. It must have been a crushing blow to the young leader, who had already spent many hours studying military history and drilling tactics so that the regiment would be disciplined and ordered when the conflict came, for by 1774; communities along the shoreline of Rhode Island were stoking the fires of freedom.

Greene nearly resigned, but Varnum persuaded him to continue as a private in the regiment.

He would dutifully march as a private with the Guard when they mustered after hearing news of the fighting in Lexington and Concord and, once assembled, marched for Massachusetts at dawn on April 20, 1775. The regiment was resplendent in new uniforms of red, green, and white; attracting a large crowd of cheering onlookers as they paraded along what is now North Main Street.

When they reached the state line in Pawtucket, a messenger overtook them with a demand from the governor that they not cross into Massachusetts. This order occasioned most of the men to lay down their arms, but Greene and his brothers, as well as another individual, procured horses and continued on, turning back only when they learned that the British had retreated to well-fortified Boston.

Soon after his return, Greene learned that he had been chosen to lead as general of the state’s army. Certainly, Greene, as a representative, had political friends, indeed, since the election of his brother Jacob as a deputy in the legislature, he had family as well. But as his biographer Gerald Carbone points out; what made Greene stand out more than these were his capabilities.[v]

 The man who had been a private but days before now found himself in command of the thousand-strong Rhode Island Army of Observation. Most of the men, like Greene himself, had enlisted from inland farms or the wharves of seaside communities; there were some freeing themselves from apprenticeships, and others signing like Paine had done nearly twenty years before; for the adventure and possible fortune with the spoils of war. At best, some had six months of muster and drill training twice a week. None had so much as taken part in a skirmish, let alone faced an enemy in battle.

Greene tirelessly recruited from Rhode Island and installed a rigorous discipline in the Roxbury camp: no cards, no liquor, and show for muster clean and shaven. The discipline of the Rhode Island brigade compared with bedraggled units from other New England states was noticed by Washington as he reviewed the troops that would become the Continental Army.  

His diligence was rewarded when Greene received a commission as a Brigadier General in the Army. At thirty-two, he became the youngest General in the Continental Army.[vi]

In July 1775, The Rhode Island brigade was encamped upon Prospect Hill, a half mile from British-held Charlestown. While there, Greene and the Rhode Islanders came under the command of Major Charles Lee, a singularly odd man to wear an American Officer's uniform. Lee had climbed to the rank of Major in the British Army, partly through his fighting in America during the French and Indian War, but he resigned his commission to become a soldier of fortune in the Russo-Turkish conflict of 1768-1774; a war which his Polish allies did not win, but which nonetheless earned him the rank of Major General. 

The Siege of Boston, as it would be named, was a long, arduous summer of suffering heat and illness. Encampments on both sides were thinned out by dysentery and other "camp illnesses." At the height of the suffering, the British forces were losing thirty men a week to illness.  

At the end of summer, Greene dispatched five hundred of the Rhode Islanders who were still fit for duty to assist the New Hampshire Regulars in fortifying the works at Ploughed Hill, a redoubt overlooking the Mystic River. Among these volunteers was Agustus Mumford, a friend of Greene's who had just recently raised funds for the poor and displaced residents of the city of Boston. Unfortunately, he became the first Rhode Island casualty of the Revolution when he ill-advisedly peered over the barricades and had his head taken off by a British cannonball.

As the Fall and then Winter approached, Greene could see morale sinking further among the recruits. He had feared all along that such inaction over these months could very well mean the dissolution of the American army. Washington, Greene, and others had at first favored a night-time raid guided by Glover's Mariner brigade of boatmen and landing across the Charles River before dawn. Instead, Washington dispatched Henry Knox and a convoy of oxen and horses to retrieve canon that American forces had captured months before at Fort Ticonderoga.

As weeks of inactivity passed, an expedition to Canada gained more favor among officers, and the original plan was abandoned as junior officers and troops were enlisted for the ill-fated march to Quebec. The Rhode Island brigade would part with some of their most able officers in Christopher Greene, a distant cousin of Nathanael, as well as Simeon Thayer and Samuel Ward. Greene occupied his men in building barracks on Prospect and Winter Hills for the bitter months that lay ahead.

That winter, Greene would write of the hardships they faced:

"We have suffered prodigiously for want of wood. Many regiments have been obliged to eat their provisions raw for want of fuel to cook it, and not withstanding we have burnt up all the fences and cut down trees for a mile around our camp, our sufferings have been inconceivable. The barracks have been greatly delayed for want of stuff. Many of our troops are yet in tents, and will be for some time, especially the officers. The fatigues of the campaign, the suffering for want of food and clothing, have made a multitude of soldiers heartily sick of service.”[vii] 

By mid-December, the Continental Army was reduced to 5,000 troops, with many more eligible for release on New Year's eve. Greene and others had hoped that a bounty could be offered to men for recruitment, a sticking point for Washington, who opposed such an offer, even as he requested the means to raise an army of 20,000 from Congress.

Some re-enlisted as they realized a bounty was not to be. Others were reportedly shamed on their return home for leaving their brethren in arms to face the British in diminished numbers.

Nathanael Greene would write that during the Connecticut troop's exodus

“The people upon the roads expressed so much abhorrence at their conduct for quitting the Army, that it was with difficulty they got provisions.[viii]

Prospects grew dimmer in January when it was reported that half the men coming into camp could not be provided with a musket. Powder was also in short supply, and while guns had been promised from Philadelphia and other sources, the troops were left to hunker down and hope the British remained in hibernation. News of the failed expedition in Canada, as well as the death of General Montgomery and the capture of so many men and officers, must have brought morale to as low an ebb as imaginable.  

Still, plans were underway to route the British from the city. With Cambridge Bay rapidly freezing over, Washington eyed a raid across the ice on the British works on Boston Neck. Though a good number of officers were hesitant to support such an action, Greene supported Washington's plan. However, a bout of jaundice would leave him bedridden for weeks and take away any opportunity to lead his men and retake Boston.

During these weeks, Colonel Henry Knox and his men returned with an arsenal of artillery. Now, the plan was to fortify Dorchester Heights and leave the British fleet in a vulnerable position. In the coming weeks, men would work furiously preparing fascines and the framing for gabines; one being a fencing constructed from bundled sharpened sticks, the other being wooden frames filled with dirt to act as barriers. Finally, on the night of March 4th, the anniversary of the Boston Massacre, some 1200 troops with entrenching tools and 300 ox carts were covered by 800 riflemen on the march to Dorchester, where they constructed the fortifications in a single night.

Though planning to retreat from the city had been underway, British General Howe was loathed to allow even the appearance that he was somehow forced to flee Boston to be his legacy to the American public and, even more likely, the press. It was surely with these thoughts in mind that he announced preparations for a 3,500 man assault on Dorchester Heights before the Americans were allowed to strengthen the fortifications.

The British rank and file persuaded him to change his mind in a council of war that evening. In those same hours, a great storm blew in from the south, the winds blowing out windows and driving vessels ashore.

By the 13th, the Americans had fortified Nooks Hill opposite the Heights and were raining a cannonade of shot at the British vessels in the harbor. The aggressive action of the Americans had its desired effect. On the morning of March 17th, the British garrison of 9,000 men, as well as just over a thousand loyalists, were safely ferried to eighty British transport vessels. Washington had pledged not to fire upon the British as they departed and ended the eleven-month siege of the city. The following day Brigadier-General Nathanael Greene was given charge of the city and the windfall of British cannon, horses, blankets, medicines, and other supplies that would aid Boston in its recovery. A month later, Greene was appointed Commander on Long Island, a key defensive position for New York. 

Once again, Greene would lose his chance to show his military skills; another illness on the eve of battle left him unable to take part in the disastrous defeat the Americans suffered on Long Island. Had he been in battle, he would likely have been captured, as were many of the Rhode Islanders, and faced imprisonment until arrangements could be made for his release, much like his distant cousin Christopher Greene had undergone after capture at Quebec. It must have been a bitter disappointment once again, but in the coming months, Greene would have his baptism under fire.

Thomas Paine did not have to walk far from his newly acquired room in a riverside boarding house to find that the enlightenment ideals of the wealthy Newtonians he had left behind in London were also here, in somewhat humbler form among the craftsmen and mechanics in North America; one of whom ran a bookstore and printing press right next door. Moreover, the man whose friendship would launch Paine’s career as an author was Scottish-born Robert Aitken, a new emigrant as well, having arrived but three years before.

At the time of their meeting, Aitken’s was set to publish a new monthly magazine which would be called Pennsylvania Magazine, or American Monthly Museum. His conversations with Paine in the weeks that followed led him to offer the job of executive editor to the aspiring author.[ix]

It turned out to be a wise decision for the publisher. Within a few months, the readership had exceeded more than fifteen hundred paid subscribers.

Each issue was a cornucopia of essays on classical authors, the texts of letters between authorities and the crown, reports, descriptions of new scientific inventions, and treatises on self-improvement, among other varied topics. The issues were mostly written by Paine, lawyer Francis Hopkinson who taught, along with president John Witherspoon of the College of New Jersey. Each wrote multiple articles under pseudonyms such as Aesop, Atlanticus, Humanus, Justice & Humanity, and Vox Populi, a device used to persuade readers of many contributors as well as to mask the authors of the more incendiary articles. 

Paine used his position to foster the “common good” as his biographer notes, 

"as an editor, he regularly sought to publish articles on more substantive issues."

These included essays on the tragedy of the ongoing tradition of dueling, an essay on women's rights, and most notably, on April 14, 1775, when he published an essay entitled African Slavery in America, part of which read

“Our traders in men (an unnatural commodity) must know the wickedness of the slave trade, if they attend to reasoning, or the dictates of their own hearts…”[x]

This essay by Paine and the response it received have been cited as the cause of the organizing of the first abolitionist society in the world. It also earned him the friendship of another Philadelphian, Dr. Benjamin Rush. Any further effect, however, would soon be overshadowed by events that occurred just a few days later.

The events of April 18th in Concord and Lexington reverberated through the colonies. Militia mustered and marched to Cambridge or outlying communities in the weeks that followed. Less than a month after the skirmishes, the Continental Congress met in Paine's newly adopted city. As he followed events and the discourse that was undertaken in the Pennsylvania State House, his articles seemed written to stoke the fires of independence and threatened his job as his publisher feared the consequences.

Paine had no such compulsion to cease writing nor to use his pen to urge American independence, even if it were to come to violent means. Although raised as a Quaker, he had decided as an adult, as with Greene, who might have himself also declared

“I am thus far a Quaker, that I would gladly agree with all the world to lay aside the use of arms, and settle matters by negotiation; but unless the whole will, the matter ends, and I can take up my musket and thank heaven he has put it in my power.”[xi]

In the coming months, he would continue his critique of Great Britain's history of Empire, and in the Fall of that year, he began composing the first pages of what would be published as the pamphlet Common Sense, in which Paine systematically exposed, through the narrative of disastrous wars and misrule;  the cracked pillars of sovereign rule, hereditary entitlement, and class divide which held up the Parthenon like façade of the late 18th century British Empire.

Paine proposed a solution between the countries, but it was nonetheless a solution that required liberty for America…

“…let a Continental Conference be held, in the following manner, and for the following purpose…to frame a Continental Charter, or Charter of the United Colonies;…fixing the number and manner of choosing members of Congress, members of Assembly, with their date of sitting, and drawing the line of business and jurisdiction between them: always remembering, that our strength is continental, not provincial; Securing freedom and property to all men, and above all things the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; which other such matter as is necessary for a charter to contain”.

Historian Gordon Wood has rightly called Common Sense “ a remarkable document,…” and explains

“Few Americans had ever read in print what Paine said about Kings and George III, that “brute of Britain” who “made havoc of mankind.”[xii] 

The pamphlet had its critics among Americans, most notably John Adams, who felt that the form of democratic government Paine advocated, and which, in fact, would strongly influence Pennsylvania's government and constitution, was

“So Democratical, without any restraint, or even attempt at Equilibrium, or Counterpoise, that it must produce confusion at every evil work." 

I believe Adams's alarm at the responsibilities given to the common man, as the more lenient political writers phrased the hordes of poor and hardscrabble citizens who would be needed to uphold a republic, would quickly unravel what order and function had been in place.

But rather than some utopian ideal as many of Paine’s and the enlightenment influences had pronounced, Thomas Paine firmly laid out his plan for a new government that needed a constitution rather than a monarchy-the framers of such must be fixed upon… the true points of happiness and freedom.

"[To] those," Thomas Paine wrote, "unenlightened conservatives who dare to ask, "Where is the King?" Tell them, in America, THE LAW IS KING."

Common Sense would be printed legally through two dozen editions and sell 150,000 copies when most pamphlets printed at the time sold at best a few thousand copies. It was a pamphlet written for the common readers, devoid of the florid or magisterial prose of the pundits and ministers who were popular authors. As its title implies, the pamphlet strove to render simple common sense in its argument for separation from the crown, and embedded within, were lines that would become a stirring call to democracy:

“Should an independence be brought about, …we have every opportunity and every encouragement before us, to form the noblest, purist constitution on the face of the earth. We have it in our power to begin the world over again”.

Even as Common Sense became a best-seller in the colonies, Paine refused any royalties so that costs were kept down and the pages were easily affordable to the reading public; which had a high reading rate in America, giving great popularity to newspapers and such pamphlets as Paine and others produced.

In fact, a pamphlet printed the summer before by Pennsylvanian John Dickinson had addressed some of these same issues as A Farmer and included his assessment of what representation should represent; but he had not the flair or the skill of rhetoric that Paine’s epistle achieved.

So popular did Common Sense and later revolutionary writings become, that his critic John Adams would declare sarcastically that the "Age of Revolution" ought to be called the: "Age of Paine." The success drew the author into a whirlwind of appearances and introductions to those men who would become the movers and shakers of the American Revolution.

Nonetheless, when the British took control of New York, Thomas Paine enlisted in the Pennsylvania Associators, a.k.a. General Roberdeau’s "Flying Camp," a volunteer regiment that was called into action when needed. Their first assignment was to march to Amboy, New Jersey, where it was rumored that the British would be landing soon. It was a fruitless march, but when they did spy the Redcoats landing on Staten Island, many were overwhelmed by the number, and the Flying Camp disbanded.

With his military unit broken up, Paine traveled cautiously north to Fort Lee, where he met commander General Nathanael Greene. The General took him in as an aide-de-camp and appointed him Brigadier. The two men took an instant liking to one another, as the General's biographer Ged Carbone notes, "some of Paine's arguments could have come from Greene's pen…".

By all accounts, Paine fared better by the pen than by the sword. He was an ungainly soldier, often the butt of jokes from his fellow enlistees, including one occasion in which his boots and wig were hidden just before an alarm was raised in the middle of the night with the brigade assembled to watch the great philosopher stumble half-dressed from his tent.[xiii]

Still, while in camp, he wrote of the American efforts in the Philadelphia newspapers. By December, however, senior officers had taken him aside and convinced Paine that the words produced by his pen and correspondence would serve the country better than he could as a soldier. Paine agreed and walked thirty-five miles to Philadelphia, expecting to be captured at any moment. Once there, he found the city in chaos, with half the population having fled and the morale of its citizens at a low ebb after news of American defeats. 

Paine set out to alter this at once and to restore faith in the American cause. He began writing a series of what would be thirteen essays, one in honor of each colony, that addressed directly with its title: The American Crisis. As his biographer attests, the collected essays “rallied his countrymen,” and with his first, “ennobled each and every citizen rebel into a heroic agent of destiny.”[xiv]

The first Crisis was published a week before Christmas in the Pennsylvania Journal. Printers in the city soon had 18,000 copies of the author's work on the street. Other printers soon put the work to the presses in other colonies. One of these many copies made its way to the Commander-in-Chief-perhaps Paine had sent a copy himself to General Washington, whom he ardently admired as both a person and a soldier.

Washington would gather his troops on the bank of the Delaware River to read Paine's words aloud to them two nights before the planned surprise attack on the Hessian-held New Jersey towns of Trenton and Princeton.

Paine's words stir us today in times of crisis and evoke in us the same resolve that it did that night to the troops gathered there:

“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer patriot and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives everything its value…”[xv]

The resultant victories on Christmas night and the following day bolstered the morale tremendously, and Congress recognized Paine's value, appointing him secretary to the United States Council of Safety, negotiating a treaty with the Iroquois from late January through March. Then, by John Adam's nomination, Congress appointed him to be secretary for the Committee of Foreign Affairs (formerly the Committee of Secret Correspondence), under whose title he spent ten months wandering back roads on various missions, obtaining information for General Greene and the Pennsylvania Assembly.  

For Major-General Nathanael Greene the years 1778-1779 were ones of great upheaval but also of great reward. He began the year at Valley Forge with General Washington and other officers of the Continental Army. He remained with them as they marched to White Plains, New York, where Greene resumed his post as Quartermaster General.  

As the spring stretched into summer, considerably more of his time was engaged in gathering supplies for the growing army that General John Sullivan would utilize to wrest Rhode Island, or  Aquidneck Island as we know it today, from the British occupiers who had seized the island nearly two years before.

Greene, of course, grew anxious to return to Rhode Island and take part in this effort. He had lobbied early on after the British invasion for a retaliatory strike. Moreover, his wife, Caty, was pregnant at home. He wrote to Sullivan enthusiastically

“I was an adviser to this expedition and therefore am deeply interested in the event….I wish a little more force had been sent…Everything depends almost on the success of this expedition. Your friends are anxious, your Enemies are watching, I CHARGE YOU TO BE VICTORIOUS”.

He complained to merchant Henry Marchant that “it has been going on five years since I have spent an hour at home”, and must have urged Washington at every opportunity to let him go, because in mid- July, the General finally relented, writing to Congress that he 

“judged it advisable to send Gen. Greene …being fully persuaded his services, as well as in the Quartermaster line as in the field, would be of material importance in the expedition against the Enemy in that quarter. He is intimately acquainted with the whole of the Country, and besides he has extensive interest and influence upon it.”[xvi]

Greene left White Plains on July 28th and rode two nights and three days to reach his wife in Coventry, where he visited briefly with her and one-year-old daughter Martha; before heading on to Newport, where he arrived in time to see that the fleet from our new French allies had arrived and was anchored off Block Island. 

General Greene was assigned command of roughly half the troops that would take the field. He marched his troops from Providence to Tiverton on August 4th. The Marquis de Lafayette followed a day later, giving them a combined 10,000 troops. An additional 4,000 French marines awaited the signal command on Jamestown, an island close by the western side of Aquidneck.

Americans knew that the British garrison held less than 7,000 men. Chances looked good for the Americans to force the British to evacuate Rhode Island. 

However,… as with the previous year’s efforts to undertake a like expedition, the combined challenges of gathering an adequate force, especially untrained and inexperienced militia: Lafayette’s aide de camp laughingly wrote that it looked as though the Americans had sent “all the tailors and apothecaries” to take up arms against the British.

The plan was for American troops to cross the Sakonnet River or East Passage to the Island, where they would combine with the French marines for the assault on land while the French fleet would bombard the fortifications the British had erected on the island.

Sadly, the expedition began with a pause, Sullivan writing to the French Commander on the early morning of August 9th, the day of the planned assault, that he needed another day to train his "Motley and disarranged Chaos of militia" in the proper method of boat boarding.

When word came, however, that the British had abandoned a redoubt close to the Sakonnet, the American General rushed 2,000 troops across the river to take the fort at Butts Hill.

An ensuing three-day hurricane-like storm and damage to the French fleet caused the delay and then the eventual abandonment of the expedition. The resultant "Battle of Rhode Island" then was, in actuality, a necessary retreat from the Island.

Greene would command roughly half the troops in the field the day of August 29th, some fifteen hundred men stationed on the west side of the Island. The day began early, with Greene taking his breakfast in a nearby Quaker household to the sound of musket fire from the area of the windmill on Quaker hill.

In the ensuing battle, Hessians attacked the American right flank, which included the 1st Rhode Island, or "Black Regiment," as well as a regiment under Capt. Israel Arnold, and a contingent of Massachusetts troops. The flank withstood the three Hessian drives to dislodge the men from around the redoubt and finally drove them from the field. Greene would write his wife a letter from his saddle late that afternoon:

“We have had a considerable action today; we have beat the enemy off the ground where they advanced upon us; the killed and wounded on both sides unknown, but they were considerable for the number of troops we had engaged…”[xvii]

In the aftermath of the Battle of Rhode Island, Greene urgently hoped to remain in the state and see to his pregnant wife. Caty had tried to stay at the encampment in Tiverton, but the stifling heat in the midst of her condition had sent her home to Coventry. While there, he received a letter from General Washington appointing him a de-facto diplomat and mediator between the French and American officers with whom a potentially serious rift had developed: 

"I depend upon your temper and influence to conciliate that animosity," Washington wrote, "…the Marquis (de Lafayette) speaks kindly of a letter from you to him on this subject. He will therefore take any advice from you in a friendly light, and if he can be pacified, the other French Gentlemen will of course be satisfied…"

Major-General Greene duly rode the eighty miles to Boston on horseback and entertained the French officers in the elegant home of John Hancock. He reported back to Washington ten days after his arrival that the Officers in question were now "upon exceeding good footing with the Gentlemen (officers) of the town" and assured the Commander-in-Chief that General Hancock himself was doing all he could "to promote a good understanding with the French officers. His house is full from morning till Night…".    

On September 23rd, Greene set off for home, his mission completed, and arrived in a drenching rain-storm to find his wife had given birth to a daughter but was now gravely ill.

Ge. John Sullivan appealed to Washington to let Greene remain in Coventry over the winter. Sullivan still had 3,500 troops in Rhode Island and had come to rely upon the Major-General’s support and counsel.

Within the week, however, Greene had asserted his own desire to return to camp, writing:

"however agreeable it is to be near my family and among my Friends, I cannot wish it to take place, as it would be unfriendly to the business of my department…"

Greene spent the winter traveling from the encampment at Middlebrook to Trenton and Philadelphia, Caty often traveling with a servant and ensconced in stately homes nearby the encampments.

He would spend much of the year of 1779 engaged in supplying the American attack on the Seneca Indian nation, part of Greene’s proposed plan to ransack the stores of the indigenous allies of the enemy.

By October, Greene was stationed on the Hudson River when he received a message from Col. Ephraim Bowen in Rhode Island. It was exceedingly good news as both a Rhode Islander and as Quartermaster General, for Bowen wrote:

“I have the Pleasure to Acquaint you of the Evacuation of this Island by the British Army on Monday night last…The Enemy have left about Fourteen hundred Tons of Excellent Hay, Sixty of (or) Seventy Tons of Straw, (and) upwards of three hundred Cords of Wood."

As the harsh winter of 1779-1780 was fast approaching, Bowen added a footnote for his friend:

"I will get you a pair of English blankets."

Coming from a man who was an unmistakable genius in calculating the political needs and wishes of his reading audience, it seemed the plan of a madman. Thomas Paine had labored away at his American Crisis series, all while still serving as clerk to Pennsylvania’s Assembly. He had been instrumental in the Assembly’s abolishment of slavery on March 1, 1780, and been given an honorary degree from the University of Pennsylvania on the 4th of July.

 Now, Paine devised a plan in which he would take a year's leave and go to England incognito to produce a scathing pamphlet that would stir unease among the people with their King. He wrote to Nathanael Greene of his plans on September 9, 1780:

“The manner in which I would bring such a publication out would be under the cover of an Englishman who had made the tour of America incognito. This wil afford me all the foundation I wish for and enable me to place matters before them in a light in which they had never yet viewed them…”

Greene was so concerned by this letter that he rode to Paine’s rooming house in Philadelphia to dissuade him of the adventure. Having spent the past weeks engaged in overseeing the conspiracy trial of British officer John Andre and conspirator with the American traitor Benedict Arnold, he could give sure advice to Paine on the consequences of being found among the enemy. Paine wisely took his advice and dropped the idea.

It was the last time the two friends would see each other in person. Greene was called away almost at once to command the American army in the southern campaign. Congress drafted Paine in the coming months to write to the French minister, asking for another loan of one million pounds. He would later take the job of secretary to Col. John Laurens, who at twenty-six had been appointed Congress' new emissary to France.

Their arrival, however, was an unhappy occasion, with the aging Benjamin Franklin disheartened by the news of his replacement, so upset that he resigned from Congress, though the body refused his request. Paine returned from France with another successful mission under his belt, and his return to Philadelphia was bolstered by jubilant crowds in the wake of America’s victory, raising toasts across the town to the fireworks that lit the night skies.

He soon felt dejected, however, as many veterans do after their return. Paine felt the country had let him down. In his poverty after the war, he became embittered as he saw others who had become rich off the conflict, he himself had often given his entire royalties and even salaries to the support of the Army. He wrote to the friend he knew would support him and hopefully influence Congress to support him financially. As Paine knew he would, Greene wrote a letter of support:

“I have always been in hopes that Congress would have made some handsome acknowledgements to you for past services. I must confess that I think you have been shamefully neglected; and that America is indebted to few characters more than to you. But as your passion leads to fame, and not to wealth, your mortifications will be the less. Your fame for your writings will be immortal. At present, my expenses are great; nevertheless, if you are not conveniently situated, I shall take a pride and pleasure in contributing all in my power to render your situation happy”.

This was the last letter Paine was to receive from his friend.

General Nathanael Greene did indeed have great expenses, and his efforts to retrieve funds swindled from him by shady creditors during the war surely led to his untimely death in 1786 at the age of forty-four.

We can only speculate on the influence Nathanael Greene would have held had he lived long enough to be part of the nation's first administration. His pragmatic approach to situations and his learning and hard-earned experience would have certainly made him a valuable asset to President Washington.

In these formative and often turbulent years of the nation’s childhood, Greene would likely have effectively grounded Jefferson’s flights of fancy about democracy becoming a world movement of peaceful takeovers from monarchy. He might also have tempered John Adam’s authoritative tendencies.

Thomas Paine would go on to write what is arguably his most remarkable work in The Rights of Man, in which a proclamation echoes those of his correspondence with General Nathanael Greene and the cause they shared together:

“…individuals themselves, each in his own personal and sovereign right, entered into a compact with each other to produce a government: and this is the only mode in which governments have a right to arise, and the only principle on which they have a right to exist.”[xviii]

[i] Nelson, Craig Thomas Paine: Enlightenment, Revolution, and the Birth of Modern Nations New York, Viking 2006 p. 14

[ii] Dexter, ed. The Literary Diary of Ezra Stiles D.D. L.L.D. Charles Scribners Sons, 1901  Vol. 1 p.213

[iii] Enough of a gentleman that he could entertain Martha Washington in conversation at Valley Forge while his wife and her husband danced into the small hours of the morning.

[iv] Nelson, Craig Thomas Paine p. 49

[v] Carbone, Gerald Nathanael Greene, A Biography of the American Revolution New York, Macmillan 2008 pp 21-23

[vi] Ibid. p. 25

[vii] Thayer, Theodore Nathanael Greene: Strategist of the American Revolution New York, Twayne Publishers 1960 p. 72

[viii] Ibid. p. 78

[ix] Nelson, p.60

[x] Ibid. p. 64

[xi] Ibid. p. 77

[xii] Wood, Gordon Power and Liberty: Constitutionalism in the American Revolution New York, Oxford University Press, 2019 p. 30

[xiii] Nelson, pp. 103-104

[xiv] Ibid. p. 107

[xv] Ibid. p. 108

[xvi] Carbone, p. 99

[xvii] Ibid, p. 112

[xviii] Nelson, p. 201


Remembering Moses and Caesar Updike

by John Dower


by John B. Dower

As Caesar and Moses toiled on one of the Cocumscussoc Plantation farms in the late summer of 1776, word came from Philadelphia to Providence concerning the future of the colonies in America. The Second Continental Congress had convened earlier in Philadelphia, culminating with all thirteen colonies voting to officially part ways with Great Britain and announce their intentions in the Declaration of Independence. Such notions of autonomy were nothing new in Rhode Island. During the past few decades, the rising friction between England and its North American provinces, Rhode Island had found itself in the middle of the fray over self-determination and increasing taxation by the British. From the Gaspee Affair in 1772, where Rhode Island colonists burned a British patrol boat looking for smugglers, to the General Assembly, having that past May been the first of the thirteen colonies to vote to “end its allegiance” to the British crown,[1] the smallest colony had continued to stir the pot of dissent. Indeed, Caesar and Moses (who up to that point were probably only known by their given names) had heard all of the blusters of independence spread through the region in recent years. What, if anything, did any of this increasingly more ominous talk of insurrection mean to them? In just two short years, they would find out.  

            Caesar and Moses were two of several enslaved people that worked the plantation at Cocumscussoc in North Kingstown, Rhode Island. As it turned out, slavery would indeed be an issue for many during the fight for independence. Almost immediately after the first publication of the Declaration of Independence was released, the document's hypocrisy as it related to slavery was condemned throughout the colonies and in England as well. The virtuous second line of the Declaration of Independence had created a paradox- “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Squaring the words with the realities of slavery proved problematic in 1776, and as we now know, would for a very long time. For the time being, life went on at Cocumscussoc just as it had for over a century.

Cocumscussoc is the area on the west shore of the Narragansett Bay that was the summer home of the Narragansett people and, in the late 1630s, the site of trading posts of Roger Williams and Richard Smith. According to Roger Williams himself, Richard Smith “put up the first English house” in Narragansett country at Cocumscussoc.[2] What would later become the “great house” of the plantation was initially called Smith’s Castle (as the historic house on the site is known today) and served as a garrison house during the 17th century. The original house was burned in 1676 during King Philip’s War and then rebuilt in 1678 by Richard Smith Junior. When the younger Smith died childless in 1692 after predeceasing his wife, most of the estate went to his nephew and niece, Lodowick Updike and Abigail Newton Updike. Lodowick and Abigail, who just happened to be first cousins and wed to each other, would accelerate the growth of Cocumscussoc into a formidable plantation going into the eighteenth century. At its pinnacle, under the ownership of Lodowick’s son Daniel, Cocumscussoc encompassed some three thousand acres.[3] By the time of the Revolutionary War, the plantation had once again passed down in the Updike family to Daniel’s son, Lodowick, owner of Caesar and Moses. The farming operation on which Caesar and Moses worked was less impressive than it had been just decades earlier, as it now amounted to around eight hundred acres, with other areas leased out to tenant farmers. [4] However, even at this reduced capacity, Cocumscussoc still required several enslaved people to maintain its viability.

Narragansett country included those areas in what had been Kings County (known today as South County, but technically Washington County). During the middle of the eighteenth-century, the plantations in that region established a “social and economic organization” that was unique “in its dependence on slave labor for large-scale agriculture.”[5] The lack of a white labor force, an abundance of fertile lands, and the temptation of cheap labor made a dreadful combination that accelerated the number of Blacks enslaved throughout southern Rhode Island. Although the Narragansett region's slaveholders never came close to challenging the numbers of the most massive plantations seen in the southern colonies, the number of enslaved per household was higher than almost anywhere else in New England.[6] From 1700 to 1750, the number of slaves rose from 85 to 625 in Narragansett country,[7] which becomes more abhorrent when one realizes that many households in the region participated in the practice, and it was not just limited to the large agricultural enterprises.

However, the "great planters” of Narragansett were responsible for the preponderance of enslaved people living there, with many owning ten or more and some holding as many as forty.[8] While it was not until the Federal Census of 1790 when the enslaved were identified differently from free people of color, the Rhode Island Colony Census of 1774 can be beneficial in confirming what households in which towns contained blacks and Indians. Newport had the largest number of Blacks and Indians at the time of the census, 1292 out of a total population of 9208.[9] South Kingstown had 650 people of color out of 2835, and North Kingstown had 290 out of its 2472 inhabitants.[10] The percentages of people of color in the three towns were- North Kingstown 12%, Newport 14%, and South Kingstown, where most of the plantations flourished during the 1700s, 23%. The average in towns across the entire colony was just under 9%. All of the localities registered numbers well above what was the norm throughout most of New England. In one household in North Kingstown in 1774, Blacks made up precisely 50% of the occupants.

In the census taken for Rhode Island in 1774, Lodowick Updike's listing shows 22 members of the household, 11 Black and 11 white.[11] We cannot be sure that all eleven of the people of color were enslaved at that time, but the Updikes had a chronicled history of slavery for the previous eight decades. The first documentation of slavery at Cocumsuccoc dates back to the inventory taken after Richard Smith Junior’s death in 1692, which recorded his ownership of eight enslaved persons.[12] The probate inventory for Lodowick’s father, Daniel, in 1757 (which incidentally lists both Caesar and Moses) contained 19 enslaved individuals.

The will of Daniel Updike listing Moses and Caesar.

            As we have seen, slavery was nothing new at Cocumsussoc on the eve of the American Revolution. It may have taken place in even larger numbers than what records indicate, “as it was popular to conceal numbers from the observation of the home government,”[13] especially during the turbulent times where taxation on all types of “property” was a lightning rod. Not surprisingly, the census ordered in 1774 was by the British Board of Trade's explicit request, increasing the likelihood that colonists did conceal their business practices, including their workforce size. Further indications of a larger slave population in and around Cocumscussoc can be found with documentation of an “extensive burial yard” for the “black servants” of the Updikes and two other families located just north of Smith’s Castle.[14] A minimum of eighty marked graves was identified, and it was believed many more existed. Pervasive slavery had clearly existed for some time at Cocumscussoc, even though the Updike plantation itself had diminished in size by the 1770s.

            We know with a great deal of certainty that both Caesar and Moses had lived at Cocumscussoc before 1757, thanks to the probate inventory taken at Daniel Updike's death. We also know that Caesar was born sometime around 1755 and identified as "Mustee" (mixed race of Indian and Black ancestry).[15] Scant little information is available regarding Moses’ early life, including when he might have been born or if he was in any way related to Caesar. Early in the 1700s, Africans began to be brought directly into Narragansett country,[16] and by the middle of the century, the enslaved Black population in the region "increased naturally."[17] If Caesar was identified correctly as a mustee, he more than likely had ancestry tied to the Indigenous population in Rhode Island, as it is thought that indentured Indians had mixed with enslaved Africans at Cocumscussoc in years prior.[18] Unfortunately, more personal information on the two enslaved young men at Smith's Castle, before the American Revolution, has never revealed itself.

            We can glean a considerable amount of general information about life on Narragansett plantations from a variety of sources, which are suggestive of the duties performed by Caesar and Moses. Cocumscussoc, like most of the other agricultural enterprises in the area that survived on enslaved labor, focused primarily on "dairying."[19] Caesar and Moses likely had some participation in dairy activities, although that was probably not their only responsibility. Enslaved people on farms "would have performed myriad tasks and worked a variety of jobs"[20] throughout their long workday. Other duties, in addition to tending dairy cattle and helping produce butter and cheese, would have included- carrying water, cutting and carrying firewood, planting and cultivating some crops, and fence building and repair. The list is probably endless as the “jack of all trades” was nearly “indispensable to Yankee masters.”[21] Nevertheless, for all their value as workers, it was likely Caesar and Moses slept their nights away in an outbuilding or barn, as only the house servants generally occupied sleeping quarters in the main house on most plantations in New England unless it was bitter cold.

The mundane life working on a farm in eighteenth-century Rhode Island was insufferable for the enslaved. Some lucky individuals could buy their freedom by working other jobs once their everyday tasks were completed on the plantations. It was also common for masters, upon their death, to reward their enslaved with freedom if they had served their owners well.[22] Richard Smith Jr. intended to do that with some of the enslaved he owned, but there is no proof that it ever took place. The other method was also used by the enslaved to achieve freedom, running away from their masters. No record of Caesar or Moses having ever attempted to flee Cocumscussoc seems to exist, although others at the Updike farms had tried. Freedom must have still seemed out of reach in 1778 for Caesar and Moses.

In the two years following the Declaration of Independence, life dragged on for the enslaved in Rhode Island, and rhetoric of liberty swirled all around them as the War for Independence intensified. Before the American Revolution, Blacks had "served in every war of consequence" during the colonial era.[23] The rolls of militias regularly contained the names of men with Indian and African ancestry, but the role of both free Blacks and free Native Americans, as well as the enslaved, became a matter of contention as the war progressed. Before American leaders had fully addressed men of color's participation in the rebellion, many free blacks and Native Americans had already aligned themselves with the colonists seeking independence from England. Many more had chosen to take up with the British.

While men of color did participate on the American side in the early months of the war, “a pattern of exclusion had developed” as time went by.[24] When George Washington took command of the Continental Army, he banned Blacks' enlistment but eventually allowed those already fighting for the American cause to continue their service. However, the insurrection leaders had still found themselves in a predicament over their Declaration of Independence and how to harmonize the document with slavery. Even in Kings County, philosophical differences persisted whether to use men of color, both free and enslaved, to fight for the American cause. For the Narragansett planters, it was purely a matter of economics and not wanting to relinquish their free labor source. Shortly, it would be neither a philosophical concern nor a matter of economics that would change some enslaved Rhode Islanders' lives and allow their participation in the Continental Army.

The Revolutionary War dragged on in 1778, with the Americans having little to show in the way of optimism beyond a surprise victory at Saratoga the year before. It had been a brutal winter in 1777-1778, especially for the Rhode Island troops that remained at Valley Forge, and the contingent from the smallest state was at that point “greatly undermanned.”[25] Not surprisingly, General Washington was already in communication with Rhode Island leaders General James Mitchell Varnum and Governor Nicholas Cooke on addressing the problem of filling their state quota. After some back and forth, Varnum halfheartedly suggested a plan allowing enslaved men of color to enlist into the Continental Army. Already in an ever more difficult position concerning on-going slavery in America, Washington’s situation had become worse with Dunmore’s Proclamation in 1775, which lured many of the enslaved in Virginia to join the British ranks with the reward of freedom. Washington eventually gave Varnum’s plan his indifferent approval.

On February 14th of 1778, the General Assembly of Rhode Island also gave their blessing to Varnum's scheme to enlist enslaved Black men from within the state. Although the act was several paragraphs long, this one excerpt summarizes the significance of the measure as it related to the enslaved- "…upon passing muster…be immediately discharged from the Service of his Master or Mistress…”[26] While there had been "no great enthusiasm for the rebellion in Narragansett country," eventually, most of the plantation families had “aligned with the patriot side.”[27] When the act passed, a provision was put in place that stated- "…Compensation ought be made to the owners…”[28] Still, many of the Narragansett planters were unhappy over the prospect of losing their enslaved workers, mainly because the they could enlist under their own volition. Upwards of a hundred did enlist.

            The reaction to the new act by Lodowick Updike is unknown, but we know that by March of 1778, Moses and Caesar became two of the enslaved Black men from Rhode Island that enlisted in the Continental Army in exchange for their freedom.[29] Much information can be garnered from the “General Treasurer’s Account,” the list used by the state to compensate the owners of the enslaved that had enlisted, and other treasurer’s records and general assembly records. Between February 15th and June 10th, some 100 plus men enlisted, most of whom had worked at Kings County's prominent plantations. Lodowick Updike was compensated £120 for the loss of Caesar's service, which was the maximum allowed.  However, the plantation owner received a reduced rate of £93 for Moses, an indication that the enslaved man may have been older or had some physical limitations. It is believed that the total number of enslaved mustees, mulattoes, Indians and Blacks that eventually joined the “outfit” was around 125.[30] This number increased when free men of color that had previously joined the army were added to the 1st Rhode Island Regiment that summer. Caesar and Moses were now Updikes, and they were off to war with those other men of color from the nearby farms.

General Treasurer’s Accounting List on which Moses and Caesar appear.

            The unit raised by the 1778 legislation, and that Moses and Caesar became members was known by many as the "Black Regiment." James Mitchell Varnum's extraordinary plan was not to only incorporate some formerly enslaved men into some regiments of the Rhode Island contingent but rather raise an entire regiment of Black soldiers.[31] It was expected that some 300 enslaved men of Rhode Island would enlist, but that notion was destined to fail. Under increased pressure from slave owners, the General Assembly reversed the enlistment legislation after a few months and effectively ended nearly all enlistments of enslaved. Even though most of its companies were made up almost entirely of men of color at the reformation of the 1st Rhode Island Regiment in the summer of 1778, and after a series of reorganizations coupled with the losses of men of color being replaced by white soldiers, the regiment became increasingly white over time. None the less, when the call to action came to the 1st Rhode Island in their very own state later that first summer, it was segregated and made up entirely of formerly enslaved Blacks led by white officers.

            After “learning the manual of arms” in the first weeks after enlisting,[32] Moses, Caesar, and their compatriots soon found themselves heading to Aquidneck Island, where Newport was located. At the time, the British still occupied Newport but had pulled back troops at the island's northern end. With the impending arrival of the allied French fleet to the south, American officials decided it was time to take back Newport by siege from the north in August of 1778. Unfortunately, an early departure by the French fleet and other factors led to the patriot's being forced to retreat off Aquidneck Island. By the end of August several engagements took place with the British and loyalist forces as the American troops retreated. Caesar appears on muster roles before and after what is known as the Battle of Rhode Island, and the 1st Rhode Island Regiment was pressed into action that day, so we can assume Caesar was present. Moses is listed as “Sick Absent” on the muster just prior to the Battle of Rhode Island, so his participation is in doubt. Several other soldiers suffered from disease at the time, including some that perished. As the retreating American troops were being pursued by the British, the Redcoats were “met by firmness” from the 1st Rhode Island.[33] Caesar and Moses's role on that day will more than likely never be known, but it should suffice to say they answered the call to defend their country.

The first muster roll of Moses and Caesar from July of 1778.

            Several months after the Battle of Rhode Island, the 1st Rhode Island Regiment was at their winter quarters in Warren, Rhode Island. That will be the last we hear of Moses Updike as the muster roll for December lists him as deceased on December 20, 1778. Whether Moses eventually perished from disease as did thousands of others in the Continental Army will remain a mystery.

            Caesar spent the next few years in anonymity other than appearing regularly on the muster rolls. His regiment was attacked at Pines Bridge in New York, where several soldiers, including officers, were killed, but Caesar, like most soldiers who participated in the American Revolution, remains unnamed in accounts of the fighting. At the Siege of Yorktown in 1781, it appears that Caesar's company was not involved directly at the frontlines, which was true of the vast majority of the soldiers present for the decisive victory. A march to Oswego, New York, that ended without any fighting would be the last event of Caesar’s five-year military stint. He was furloughed at Saratoga along with many of the formerly enslaved men from Rhode Island on June 15, 1783 and later honorably discharged.

            Moses and Caesar Updike were relatively obscure figures like most men who fought for the American cause. The story of the two Updikes was fairly typical of the enslaved that chose to fight to gain their individual freedom while serving the fledgling nation. Many died, while some served for five years and were honorably discharged. Yet, an analysis using the list of enslaved men that enlisted from “General Treasurer’s Accounts,” along with individual entries of payments made to additional slaveholders by the treasurer[34],  payments ordered by the general assembly to owners of enlisted slaves[35], the military records and compilations found in the Regimental Book for Rhode Island[36] and Forgotten Patriots,[37] tell us that Moses and Caesar, and the men that enlisted with them, were anything but typical. Of the approximately 125 former slaves from Rhode Island, 51 died of unknown causes (most likely disease) during the five years from 1778 to 1783, at least 11 were killed in action, 3 of the several POWs were never seen again, 3 never mustered in after signing up, 8 deserted permanently (a number well below the Continental Army average), and 42 were honorably discharged. Many suffered from starvation, injuries and illnesses that were never documented.

             The Declaration of Independence inspired “the notion that enslaved people had their natural liberty stolen.”[38] The Updikes saw it that way, and their enlistment is the confirmation. They served virtuously for America in the process of getting back that freedom. Caesar was awarded an Honorary Badge of Distinction for giving five years of his life to the cause. Moses gave his life. Only Caesar was rewarded with something that both Updikes believed was worth dying to achieve.

Notes:

[1] Christian McBurney, The Rhode Island Campaign: The First French and American Operation in the Revolutionary War (Yardley, Pennsylvania: Westholme Publishing, 2011), 10.

[2] Howard Millar Chapin, The Trading Post of Roger Williams with those of John Wilcox and Richard Smith(Providence: E.L. Freeman Company, 1933), 16.

[3] Wilkins Updike, History of the Episcopal Church in Narragansett Rhode Island (New York: Henry M. Onderdunk, 1847), 180.

[4] Carl R. Woodward, Plantation in Yankeeland (Chester, Connecticut: The Pequot Press, 1971), 63.

[5] Joanne Pope Melish, Disowning Slavery: Gradual Emancipation and “Race” in New England 1780-1860 (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1998), 13.

[6] Lorenzo J. Green, The Negro in Colonial New England (New York: Columbia University Press, 1942), 98.

[7] Woodward, 72.

[8] Jared Ross Hardesty, Black Lives, Native Lands, White Worlds: A History of Slavery in New England (Boston: University of Massachusetts Press, 2019), 91.

[9] General Assembly of Rhode Island, Census of the Inhabitants of the Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations in 1774 (Providence: Knowles, Anthony & Company, 1858), 239.

[10] Ibid., 239.

[11] Ibid., 83.

[12] Woodward, 53.

[13] Updike, 174.

[14] Rhode Island Historical Cemetery Commission, “Cemetery Database,” cemetery number 246, accessed January 3, 2021, rihistoriccememteries.org/newsearchcemeterydetail.aspx?ceme-no=NK346

[15] Bruce C. MacGunnigle, Regimental Book for Rhode Island 1781 &c. (East Greenwich, Rhode Island: Rhode Island Society of the Sons of the American Revolution, 2011), 37.

[16] Christy Clark-Pujara, Dark Work: The History of Slavery in Rhode Island (New York: New York University Press, 2016), 27.

[17] Ibid., 51.

[18] G. Timothy Cranston and Neil Dunay, We Were Here Too: Selected Stories of Black History in North Kingstown(Create Space Independent Publishing, 2015), 85.

[19] Greene, 105.

[20] Hardesty, 86.

[21] Greene, 119.

[22] Woodward, 73.

[23] W.B. Hartgrove, “The Negro Soldier in the American Revolution,” The Journal of Negro History 1, no. 2 (1916): 112.

[24] Benjamin Quarles, The Negro in the American Revolution (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1961), 13.

[25] Ibid., 55.

[26] Rhode Island State Archives, “Act creating the 1st Rhode Island Regiment, also known as the "Black Regiment," 1778," accessed January 19, 2021, https://www.sos.ri.gov/assets/downloads/documents/Black-Regiment.pdf

[27] Woodward, 133.

[28] Rhode Island State Archives, “Act creating…”

[29] Rhode Island State Archives, “General Treasurer’s Accounts 1761-1781,” accessed January 9, 2021, https://sosri.access.preservica.com/uncategorized/IO_69917081-a9d3-4b27-bfb6-9b45994e00ad/

[30] McBurney, 47.

[31] Robert A. Geake and Loren Spears, From Slaves to Soldiers: The 1st Rhode Island Regiment in the American Revolution (Yardley, Pennsylvania: Westholme Publishing, 2016), 20.

[32] Quarles, 77.

[33] McBurney, 187.

[34] Rhode Island State Archives, “General Treasurer’s…”

[35] Rhode Island and John Russell Bartlett. Records of the colony of Rhode Island and Providence plantations, in New England: Printed by order of the General Assembly. Providence: A.C. Greene and brothers, state printers [etc.], v8-10.

[36] MacGunnigle, 59-79.

[37] Eric G. Grunset, Forgotten Patriots: African American and American Indian Patriots in the Revolutionary War(Washington, D.C.: National Society Daughters of the American Revolution, 2008), 187-252.

[38] Hardesty, 128.


Were The Updike's Loyalists or Patriots?

by Robert Geake


by John B. Dower, Robert A. Geake, Marilyn T. Harris

Their World Turned Upside Down: Were the Updikes Loyalists or Patriots?

                                                                                                                   

     Among the anecdotes on the history of Smith’s Castle collected and recorded by Austin Fox, owner of the property and the Cocumcussoc Dairy in the early twentieth century, was an amusing story. The tale claimed that the interior shutters in the dining room were installed during the time of the American Revolution so that neighbors could not spy the family drinking British tea.

 The few 18th century neighbors the Updikes had were quite far removed from sight of the house.  One could , however, argue that a determined patriot might have gained access through Updike Harboras it was called on the 1777 British period map on display in the dining room, to seek evidence of such “disloyal” activity. While we find the idea of the shutters being constructed for that purpose as amusing today as it would have for the guests of Mr. and Mrs. Fox regaled with the tale, it seems the neighbors may have had other good reason to suspect the family of Loyalist tendencies.

 The colonists who most opposed war with Great Britain were wealthy merchants, and those men whose farms supplied goods to British and West Indian ports. Several of the famous Narragansett Planters were identified as loyalists, others were suspect throughout the conflict and into the years beyond. At the beginning of the unrest between British authorities and the Massachusetts Bay  Colony, avowed loyalists had fled to Newport where the ports remained opened. They continued there for the duration of the British occupation of Aquidneck Island (Dec. 1776-Dec. 1778). It was especially during this time that suspicions reached their peak, and Rhode Island’s authorities openly questioned the loyalty of Lodwick Updike. 

 Lodowick Updike was fifty-two years old at the time the conflict with Great Britain began, and his loyalty was questioned almost from the beginning. At least one neighbor did so publicly. On the basis of this accusation, the Town Council refused to let him add his signature to the oath of allegiancewith the other colonies.

 Such a ban not only placed a public stain on the accused, but could also mean outright banishment. Most suspected loyalists were no longer given the protections and rights of ordinary citizens. They were often prohibited from practicing their profession, given higher tax rates, and banned from purchasing any land. For Updike, a prolonged period of punishment could have ruined the family export trade.

Among Sheriff Beriah Browns papers were the documents detailing at least some of the suspicion. 

 An order issued by Rhode Island’s General Assembly on April 19, 1777 reads in part:

     Whereas Mrs. Sarah Slocum and her family are suspected of having communicated intelligence and afforded supplies to the enemy at Newport. It is therefore resolved that Mr. Lodowick Updike be requested and enpowered forthwith to remove the said Mrs. Sarah Slocum and her family from his farm in North Kingstown…[i]

 The order further stated that if Updike refused to remove the family within ten days, 

The Sheriff for the County of Kings County (Beriah Brown) is hereby directed to remove them, and that she with her family reside in such parts on the main as are distant not less than two miles from the salt water.

 An entry from minister Ezra Stiles shows that the Slocum family may well have been engaged in such activity, and potentially worse enterprises. Stile’s entry for May 17, 1777 reads:

 This Day Hart executed at Providence for Treason by Judg at a court Martial. He was connected with the Slocums of Updikes Newtown in giving Intelligence to the En(em)y, in putting off forged Money, Enlisting &c. He avowed it & openly approved of the Kings Cause & wished Success to it. He was apprehended Tuesdy or Wedy last, a Court Martial found him guilty on Thursdy, two ministers attended him on Friday, and this day the Gallows were made & he was executed, as one told me who saw the Execution, This is speedy Justice[ii].  

 This was John Hart, born in Little Compton, but now returned to Rhode Island under nefarious business, the forgery and counterfeiting of paper currency. Such an act was condemned by General Washington because it deflated the actual Continental funds that supported the Army. Hart’s name was known to Washington, as he wrote to Jonathan Trumbell Jr. nearly a month before the arrest of the forger:

    …one John Hart is gone to Rhode Island to pass Counterfeit Money-it highly imports us to detect and apprehend these Villians whose Crimes are of great enormity…[iii]

 The Providence Gazette and Country Journal of 17 May 1777 reported that on 12 May

     “a Person by the Name of Hart was taken at Exeter, and committed to Gaol here as a Spy. A Number of counterfeit Forty-eight Shilling Bills, dated November, 1776, in Imitation of the Massachusetts Money of that Date, were found on him, which he confesses he brought from New-York. He was Yesterday tried by a Court-Martial, and we hear is to be executed this Day, at Eleven o’Clock[iv]”.

 As for the Slocums family, despite the clear order that the sheriff should remove the family if Updike refused to carry out the order, a second order from the Assembly on December 21stshows that if the Widow Slocum and her sons had been removed to another location, it did not deter their efforts. Given Updike’s reputation, it is also likely that the first order was simply ignored. The second order, composed in the Upper House of the Assembly, should have made the seriousness of the matter perfectly clear:

Wheras this Assembly hath received information that a Correspondence is maintained with the enemy at the House of the widow Slocum in North Kingstown, and it being known that the Family there are very unfriendly to the Liberties of America whereby it is very unsafe for the Welfare & happiness of this State that said family should be suffered to continue any longer in Possession thereof. 

 Whereas Resolved, that the Sheriff of the County of Kings County forthwith remove the said widow Slocum and the Family that t lives there to some other place at least ten miles distant from the shore…

 That same day, the Lower House of the Assembly passed the order and amended that:

 …if the said Sarah Slocum, or either of her Children shall after their said removal be found in any part within this State within the said distance of ten miles of any of the shores thereof, The said Shefiff of the County in which they, or either of them may so transgress, or his Deputy is hereby empowered and directed forthwith to apprehend and Commit them to the Gaol in said County…

 There is no documentation of Lodowck’s response.

 Records of the February Assembly session of 1778 revealed that at least some of the local population were loyalists and had chosen to abandon their farms and businesses. The Assembly noted that they had received notice that 

 Samuel Boone, William Boone, John Wightman, son of Valentine, Ephraim Smith, Ebenezer Slocum, Charles Slocum, and Thomas Cutter, have gone to the Island of Rhode Island, and have joined the Enemy…

 Sheriff Beriah Brown was then ordered to confiscate and make a full accounting of all property.

 Lodowick Updike did not leave Cocumscussoc, neither did his brother-in-law Benjamin Gardiner. Both estate owners had been persistently accused of disloyalty by a Mr. Phillips, which prevented them from signing the oath. Now the men petitioned the General Assembly for permission to sign.

     The year 1778 was one of upheaval for the Updike family and there way of life. Indeed, it was their world turned upside down. One disruption was caused by a reduction in their work force. In the month of February two, possibly three slaves enlisted in the Continental Army when the Assembly passed an Act permitting enslaved men to enlist and earn their freedom. Then there was the necessity of appearing before the Assembly to settle the matter of the oath.

 Sixteen year old Daniel Updike recorded in his 1778 diary that in July he travelled with his father to Providence for his appearance at the Assembly, along with his Uncle and their legal representatives:

 Sept. 30th

…Went to Assembly with my Father for hi to have permission of signing the First Oath; which the Town Council had denied him, and my Uncle Benja Gardener by the influence of P. Phillips. 

 31sr Benja Gardners case came on anf he was allowed to sign by all the lower house but six & and all the Upper house but one. Accordingly my Father & I went to NKingstown this night. N.E. storm

 November 1st My Father and I attended the assembly but his affair would not come on as Mr. Phillips had let the Evidences on his side go home to delay the ,atter. We staid at Mr. Robinsons all night. Bad Storm at N.E. & it was observed by all the House tha Mr. Phillips concerned himself very much in these matters or cases which made him appear interested in it, as I believe he was[v].

 The young, and soon to be lawyer Daniel suspected that Phillips was profiteering from the property confiscated from the families who had fled to Newport and was trying to force Lodowick to do so as well. However, there were further delays in resolving the matter.. His Father’s case was adjourned until December. They travelled home in a heavy rain, as the storm continued through another day. 

 On the last Monday of December, the General Assembly convened once again, and during the proceedings voted and resolved that 

 “Mr. Lodowick Updike be, and is hereby, permitted to subscribe the test, heretofore ordered to be subscribed by the inhabitants of this state; and that hereupon he is entitled to all the privileges of a subject of this state”.

 The father was thus acquitted in the eyes of authorities, but the records of his sons service during the war would later come under question.

 On October 18, 1779 Daniel recorded in his diary:“Went up to the Hill where I trained with militia first time”. This specified first date of service would cause him much delay and bring renewed suspicion on himself when he applied for a pension in July 1833. The problem was that in his pension testimony before Chief Justice Thomas W. Green, Daniel Updike, then seventy-two years old claimed that he “had enrolled in Captain John Browns Company of Militia in said North Kingstown in Col. Dyer’s Regiment early in the spring of the year 1777. He also testified that he was drafted several times & served in said Company in the Course of that year, not less than four moths…”

 Updike claimed to have been stationed in Wickford, patrolling Boston Neck, and Bissel Mills[vi], as well as serving a month at the encampment of troops positioned for General Jeremy Spencer’s planned invasion of Newport. 

 Daniel claimed also to have served in the same company in the following year of 1778, mentioning a brief episode against “the incursions of Wallace”, and later to have served in the Battle of Rhode Island. All these events of course, took place before the date that Daniel himself had recorded as his first training with the militia (October 1779).

 There may be a logical reason for this discrepancy. Perhaps he meant two different militias and enlistments? Wickford had its own Newtown Rangers.In the spring of 1777, the time Daniel mentions in his pension testimony, enrollment in the local militia would have been a far less risky enlistment, and a popular option for the sons of wealthy plantation owners. The date of his later first training with the militia came just a week before the British evacuated Rhode Island.

 His diary from 1778-1779 , while sparse, does mention Col. Harry Babcock, the Major-General of the Rhode Island Militia, with whom at 16, he was familiar enough to call at his home. The diary contains references to Babcock’s brother-in-law John Bours, and meeting Captain Dudley Saltonstall, then returning from the beating his fleet had taken from the British on the Penobscot River.

 So what are we to make of the discrepancy in years served? In the difference between the testimony of joining in the spring of 1777 and the recorded evidence of its being in the fall of 1779? To further complicate matters, nearly two years after Daniel’s pension was filed, a questionable came in reference to the pension application filed by younger brother James Updike.

 James Updike had enlisted as the record shows “being then 14 years of a age…was received as his father’s substitute”. He claimed in his application that at the age of 15 he was appointed adjutant, a position of staff officer that came with much responsibility and the recording of received and written orders.

In a lengthy letter, a man signing himself as “Your Friend, A Republican Farmer”, lists a number of hopeful pensioners who he resoundingly felt did not deserve a cent of government money.

 Dear Sir, You have begun a good  work in this town by Suspending two of the Revolutionary pensioners namely Samuel Thomas and James Updike for they have already drawn from our government more dollars than they ever did hours service in the Revolutionary War to my Certain knowledge …I have known them both from my Cradle and I am sure that these two men never did more than one week service in that war.

 Now Sir, if you will suspend 8 or 10 more of them that I allege never did one year’s service in that war….I will give you their names:

 Daniel Updike never did one day of service in that war

Daniel E. Updike        Do.                   Do.                   Do.

 The Republican Farmer’s letter continues to name others who he claimed had falsified their pension applications, including  Augustus Hurling, John Northup, Isaac Spink, Isaac Hall, and William Reynolds who did but “four months service”. His letter lists another slew of men who served three months or less, but who he believed had falsified their testimonies; even Major Harry Babcock, who the writer claimed “got some of his drunken Generals to testify for him[vii].”

 Clearly the writer of the letter had a bone of contention with these men. Or did he possibly misunderstand or disagree with the 1833 Act of Congress that allowed men who had served in militia units to apply for pensions?

 Let’s re-examine Daniel Updike’s testimony about enlisting in the spring of 1777. The previous year had seen the formation of the Newtown Rangers after a field cannon had been sent from the State for the towns defense in March 1776. The Newtown Rangers trained themselves in its usage and set up three fortified locations in town from which they could fire it, should the need arise[viii].

 Such fortified sites were constructed at Quidnesset. Poplar Point, and Barbers Heights above Saunderstown. The Newtown Rangers, as historian G. Timothy Cranston has described them “were made up of boys too young and men too old to serve in the armies of the Revolution…”. Daniel Updike would have been fifteen at time he recalled enlisting.

 That year of 1777, the Rangers fended off an attempted landing by scoring a direct hit on a British sailing vessel from Poplar Point. This may be Daniel’s recollection of fending off an “incursion” that he testified as occurring a year later. Further, the afore-mentioned Col. George Babcock commanded the Newtown Rangers during that encounter. 

 It would seem that Updike was recalling his time with the Newtown Rangers, and that he would have joined another unit after turning sixteen by 1779, the year he remembered as training with a militia the first time. The distinction between a unit trained in Artillery and one trained as a field unit, is distinct on many levels. 

 Further evidence can be found in an Order issued on the same day his Father was absolved of any disloyalty through involvement with the Slocums and John Hart. The Assembly ordered that the militia in Updike’s Newtown be “formed out”, or inactivated. Daniel may well then have had his first formal muster and drill as a member of the Rhode Island militia the following year, after the Continental Congress commissioned the states to formalize the previously loosely regulated bands of independent units from New England communities.

 James Updike was awarded a pension of $80.00 per annum on April 25, 1831. Claims that he served less than his application stated were rebutted by numerous witnesses who stated that he had served two years and “entered the journals of Colonel Dyer”. Daniel Updike’s widow Ardelissa was awarded a payment of $240.00 on November 4, 1834 for her husband’s service as a private for two years under Captain Brown of Colonel Dyer’s Regiment.

 It seems then that the Updike’s did everything they could to prove they were loyal to the patriot cause, even if they did like to sip their tea behind closed shutters.

          

[i]Arnold, James ed. Narragansett Historical Register Vol. 3, p. 57

[ii]Diary of Ezra Stiles Vol. 2, p. 160

[iii]

[iv]http://founders.orgUniversity of Virginia See Washington’s Letter to Jonathan Trumbell Jr. April 12, 1777

[v]As transcribed by Robert A. Geake from A Diary of Daniel Updike, in the Years 1778-1779 Rhode Island Historical Society. Published in A Cocumscussoc ReaderRIFootprints Press 2017 pp. 40-41

[vi]An early name for the area near Tower Hill.

[vii]NARA M804. Revolutionary War Pension and Bounty-Land Warrant Application Files. 2435  Page 55 

[viii]Cranston, Tim The Oft-Forgotten Story of the Wickford Gun The Independent, July 15, 2018


A Lonely Country: The Trials of Esther Smith

by John Dower


By Robert A. Geake

 Unlike Joan Smith, the enterprising wife of Richard Smith Sr., the woman whom her son came to marry would not find comfort or opportunity in the wilderness of Cocumscussoc. For Esther Smith, her time on the farm at Smith’s Castle might as well have been an eternity and her declining health is recorded in a series of letters between her husband and his friend Governor John Winthrop Jr. of the neighboring colony of Connecticut. By the time of her arrival at Cocumscussoc, the estate had already begun its transition from trading post to plantation. She oversaw a slave woman named Sarah whose five young boys likely herded the over one hundred cattle on the farm, as well as goats and hogs that were kept on the plantation. The production of cheese was still a staple of the farm, and by 1666 Richard Smith Jr. was sailing a pair of boats loaded with sundry goods back and forth to Barbados as well as to England several times over the years. As to the heavy labor at Cocumscussoc, this was left to Sarah’s husband Ceaser, and another slave named Ebed-Melich[i].

John Winthrop Jr., the son of John Winthrop, the founding governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, was a learned man, and is generally acknowledged to be one of the first trained physicians in America. When Esther began to fall ill at Cocumscussoc, Richard Smith Jr. turned to Winthrop for help through frequent correspondence.

Our first glimpse of an illness plaguing Esther comes from a letter dated January 11, 1665, in which he thanks Winthrop for 

    …all you(r) love and care which you have taken about her. We received the rubla powder sent, as also the black salve sent last with your letter dated November 24th. My kindswoman hath received much good by what she hath taken from you. It still remayns layme and in payne, it running two and froe sumetimes in her neck and shoulder & arme & hand and sumtimes in her hips, thys, and kne, they being still week.  We have hopes that she will in time with the helpe of God and you(r) good remedys grow well[ii]

At least one application of the rublia powder had enabled her to resume basic tasks for a colonial wife:

     My kindswoman had an extreme payne in here hand rist since you(r) worship sent the last rubla powder, in so much that she could not sewe nor nett or doe anything at all with her hand: then she tooke a porchine of it according to you(r) worships derecion and it made her hand well, removed the payne that nowe she hath good use of it[iii]

By early August, Winthrop’s prescriptions seem to have temporarily cured most of her ailments.

   …my kindswoman hath fowned much benifitt in what she hath taken from you. She is much amended and can gooe aboutte a great deall beter than she could, butt her tooe on the other foote is bade still, as also that foote troubells her, having a numbness and the tooe as it was, the bottom of the foote is painefull to her…she bathes her tooe according to your derecione.[iv]

By April of 1666, Esther was in great pain again, and her husband wrote again to Governor Winthrop, seeking more medicine:

     I make bould to trobell you as relating to my Couzens distemper, its still bad, she being still lame in her kne, hipe & thye, & often it runes up and downe in her arams & showldrs & necke & baike. Also she is trobled with a tingling in her thyes, but her you(r) Rubela powder doth remove it so that nowe she is indifrent well: butt onley in her knee, thy & hipe & too ether it constantly remaynes & sumtimes runes in to other parts as above exprest. She had an intent to have come up to you this Spring but the wether being could & the journey fare (far) & she not abell to ride, it being could to gooe by water, doe make bould to request forder favor that you would advise her by wrighting and sending what may be good for her to take…[v]

Despite her ailments, the work on the farm went continued. Along with the letter, Esther sent two cheeses to the governor that had aged over the winter.

Winthrop sent Esther Smith a supply of new medicines, and a grateful Richard Smith Jr. reported to the governor again in the spring of 1667:

     Those things that you left with my Couzen she hath according to you(r) derecions made use of, and I judge under God it saved her life this winter; for she was troubled with a husking coufe (cough) and a great stopige in her stomok, in so much she was almost spent, and had bin in her grave had it not bin for you(r) morning Powder, or that you derected her to take in the morning. The first time she tooke of it she found ease, so she tooke it all, seven months together, and it clearly cured her of that distemper[vi]

Still, other ailments plagued Esther. In the same letter her husband added:

   …She is att times troubled with a great paine in her knee, espesaly when she does much sture, and most twowards night, & seldum or never free of sume payne in it. Acording to you(r) derecion I bought a Cupping glase at Bostone,  butt we knowe not howe to use it. Sir, she hath bin very lame this 3 weeks: its probell she cached cowld; he fisick she hath taken I think all. If you please to acomadate her farder with any thing that you think mett we shall be very thinkfull…[vii]

Once again, Winthrop’s remedy provided Esther some relief, and in June he penned:

   …This is to returen you thainkfullnes for those things you last sent by Capt. John Alyne, which my Couzen intends to take according to you(r) derecions. She hathe bine very lame this spring att times, but when she takes of you(r) fisike, she is much bettered by it. Sir, that powder you wright to knowe what it was which did her so much good I cannot better describe it than to the leafes of dryed rosemary rubd, for coulor, & it would swime on the beare sume of it. Its all spent, so that she hath non left for a sampell.[viii]

The Governor sent along more medicine, for which the Smiths were most appreciative:

   Many thainks for you(r) love and care about her: she hath taken latly of you(r) pisike and powder sent by Edward Mesenger, she finds it doth her much good. The rubella powder sinc she toke it she is far better then she was, and it wrought well, & also the other powder you left her when you was last here she hath taken of it. She had a stopig in her stomok as formarly, but that powder sent by Edward Mesenger hath done her much good…[ix]

Although Esther’s problems continued into the new year (1669), she continued to be helped by the Governor’s treatments:

   You(r) leter, with what you sent last, came safe to hand…According to you(r) derecions shee hath taken her phisicke and aplyed bathing and that playstar to her ainkell. Her phisik wrott well and her ainkell is much bettered by it, sumtimes no payn in it att all…[x]

Apparently the slave Sarah was also suffering from some ailment, for Smith noted in the same letter that “Sarah is much better since you(r) Worship gave her that powder.”

In May, Smith informed the Governor that Esther “…hath bine better this winter then usually shee hath bine other winters.” While this was a stroke of good fortune for her, others in the colony were suffering:

     Here is many pepoll deed (dead) at Rode Island the later hand of winter and this Springe 30 or 40: Mr. John Gard  thr chife, others those you know not, and very sickly still; it takes (them) with a payne in hed & stomoke & side, on which folowes a fever & dyes in 3 or 4 dayes maney.[xi]

Smith himself resorted to taking some of the doctor’s “physik” during this season, and reported that “I found it did me much good, Sir.”

He wrote in the same letter of his intention to leave Cocumscussoc for several months, though he takes pains to assure him that Esther will be looked after:

     Sir, I have an intent for Eingland suddenly, I hope to gooe in June next…I intend to    returen next yeere if God please to give me life and helth…My Couzen Ester I shall leve at Narragansett; were it not that shee hath fownd so much helpe and favor from you I knowe I could not perswayde her to staye, for shee accounts her life is preserved by what you send her, with God’s blessing to it.[xii]

Esther herself included a brief note to Winthrop, doubtless with the hope of his continued ministrations:

     Hounored Sir,  humbell service presented. I make bowld to present you herwithall with a pr of socks, stiripe hose and stokings and shoos. They are butt meme, I could wish they were beter. Be plesed to except of them from shee that is never abell to recompenc you(r) great love and favor  to me.[xiii]

On the 2nd of June, Richard sent a letter from New London, explaining that he was leaving earlier than expected, and sending his hope that the governor keep in touch with Esther and would “still be assistant to her in what may doe her good”.

After his journey to England, and the outfitting of a ship for trade with Barbados, Smith  thanked Winthrop once more 

“…for you(r) kindness to my Couzen in my abstance; that bathing powder did her much good and for a good continyance of time it made her lame lige with outt ache or payne…she bathed the lige with you(r) powder and untell Aprell from January shee had no payne, butt since Aprell she is sumtimes troubled against chayng of wether.[xiv]

Being consumed over the next few years with the continuing struggle to keep the Narragansett Country intact, Smith barely mentions Esther’s condition again until the summer of 1672, when he wrote that she “…is better than ever she was since she was first lame.”

The continuing struggle to keep the Narragansett Country intact continued, and dominates his correspondence over the next two years. In one missive he complains that ”Rode Island Generall Asemly have made many strainge kind of Aicts, or Lawes as they call them, and quitt contrary to reason.[xv]

The following March, it was the Smiths turn turn to comfort Winthrop, who was recovering from illness himself, and had lost his wife the previous November. Richard consoled that they were both “hartaly sorey for the lost of Mistris Wintrop” and “my wiufe deseyred me to present her service to: you, with many thaings for all you(r) love. She hath herewith sent you a small token, namly sixe cheses and one small caske of Shuger. She is manye times trubled with payne in her kne, butt is far beter than formally she was…[xvi]

Shortly after this letter was written however, Esther fell ill again. In May of 1673, she was very ill, and that the ministrations of a local doctor had only wrought more suffering. 

John Winthrop Jr. courtesy of the Massachusetts Historical Society.

     My lost is likely to be also considerabell, my wiufe being at this time very sicke & weeke having a continuall payne in her bowles & and all about her, her stomoke gone, and littell rest & very faint. Itt toke her about sixe wecks agooe with a payne all around her midell. One Doctor Greneland gave her sumthing which did sume what medigatt the payne for a while, but nowe shee is in extremity with it daye & night, no partt of her body fre from payne, in so much that I doutt shee will not continue longe…[xvii]

 

Richard Smith prepared himself for the worst, but he was not giving up on Esther. Two days later, he wrote frantically to Winthrop for help. The document itself is testimony to a time when medicine, still in its infancy in the late 17thcentury, could hardly assure people of a cure; and it bore witness as well, to the expression of utter helplessness that came when a loved one fell so critically ill. 

From the letter it is clear that Esther was in the fight of her life:

     Sir, I have sent this indyan to you to gett sumthing of you for my wiufe, she being exceeding ile and wecke, being taken this day seven weckes with a great payne toke her in her hipes & her thyes & with a sorenes all round her as if it had bin a mighty swelling. The next daye itt came into her bowells with a raiking payne as if her bowells had bin rotten, as if her bowells would drape from her. She being thus 12 dayes and all most ded, I goot Doctor Grindland to come over to her, whoe gave her two glisters & sum cordial which did medigatt the payne, with a dry glister blowne up of tobacco which did cause wind to expel; this did ease for a while, butt nowe she hath had the licke payne this sixteen dayes and very restles, cannot slepe and her stomoke gone. Sir, shee having had such experience of you(r) love to her is nott willing to take aney thing more of Mr. Grindland; therfor have sent this barer up to you deseyring you to send her what you thinke may doe her good, you having already bin under God the preservacion of her liufe…She toke of you(r) phisicke about a wecke before shee was taken sicke, which did worke well, butt nowe is so wecke shee cannot take aney, or dare nott except you(r) advise. Praye dispatch the indyan baicke with all spede.[xviii]

The next day, Richard Smith dispatched another letter:

“MUCH HOUNERED SIR, …yesterday I sent an Indyan to you requesting sumthing for my wiufe, butt had forgot to deseyr to send sume of thatt powder tyed up in the browne paper to be taken at midnight or when paines take her. It was sent first, shee perceves it doth her much good, deseyrs you to send her sume by the first.[xix]

 The medicines from Winthrop arrived within a few days as Smith acknowledged on the 25th of June 1673.  However, within that letter was the caution of a greater calamity coming to Cocumscussoc and impending hostilities with the indigenous neighbors.

“The newes is all wares and great preperacon for it.” he wrote Winthrop, “This barer Indyan I sent about 6 dayes agooe, who returned for fere of the Wampequags, & have gott him nowe to adventure to fech what you(r) plesewer (pleasure) is to send.”

Smith’s mention of the Indian bearer’s fear of the Wampanoag reflects the tension of the times, as Metacom, (also known by the English name Philip) was attempting to form a gathering of tribes against the United Colonies of Massachusetts and Connecticut. Although Rhode Island, being under Quaker governance was shunned for inclusion in the United Colonies, its authorities would ultimately maintain the peace. Smith himself often found himself acting as a mediator between the tribe and the United Colonies as tensions escalated.

Smith’s use of Indigenous people to act as couriers of important messages, and even the delivery of life saving medicines was not uncommon in the 1600’s. The practice, however, remains one of the most underwritten histories when trade, interdependence, and trust aligned the settlers with local indigenous people. 

At the time of his letter, storm clouds were just beginning to gather, and in the remoteness of Cocumscussoc, Smith was obviously relieved that he could still rely upon the services of the Narragansett runners who relayed messages swiftly up and down the coast of Southern New England.

He would write again to Winthrop in July that: 

     I make bould to aquaint you thatt the things sent by the Indyan came saufe, and sume since, & according to you(r) derecion she toke the pills which did not oparate enoufe to cause a stole, butt towards the evening toke a glister, then it caused severall stolles. The next pills did the licke with the help of a glister, and the two last times shee toke pills it did operatt with out a glister. She hath taken all the pills, and according as derected doe take the Cordiall powdrs as derected for the daye time, as also that powder for night times, tied up for distincion in the browne paper, which she greatt help and ease by. In extremity of payne it causeth ease & rest, itt shee still remaynes wecke, ille and faint, and butt litell or no stomoke. In the evening she is troubled with a payne in her beley, baicke, hipes and thyes, which runs to and fro all night, so that she cannot rest; butt in extramaty of payne and towards daye itt abates somewhat, butt shee is ille every daye also, butt not halufe so bad as att night…Shee is nowe taken with a tingling numbnes in her hips and thyes, a dednes in them, and payne thatt she can hardly lye in her bed. She drinks a pretty deall of saike to suportt her when redy to faint with extrematy of payne. Sir, I humbly thainke you for you(r) great love in sending whatt already receved & doe make bould  to aquaint you with her condicion nowe, requesting you(r) farther favour to send her whatt elce you judge mette, shee being ferefull if she should recover this fitt of ilnes that she shall lose the use of her limes (limbs).[xx]”  

On July 8th, Smith wrote that although ”the things by this barer…came safe to hand”  in the interim, 

“My wiufe was taken the last Lords daye was seven nights with a great payne in her shouldrs & armes & hands, and contunys in such extrematy that they are as itt were mortified & deed with payne, not numbred payne. Her right armen & hand is the worst, and the other decayes and wecknes apace, and with such extrematy of payne shee is in, that shee is sensless with itt for a while.[xxi]

Her husband believed that she might be suffering from extreme gout. Esther he wrote, was especially anxious that the Indian bearer return and bring back some of the rubila powder she had taken before with great relief.

In a postscript he added  “Shee hath her uayans of hands and arms swelled much & looks black with the blod in ym”.

By the end of the month, Esther was responding to the doctor’s medicines. Smith sent a message from Hartford by a Native American named Wonacquomuchquen. “This Indyan I mett with axidentally, gooeing about his owne bisnes to Coneticott” Smith explains, “by whom I make bould to give you an aco: of my wiufe…”

That account included that  ”…twise she hath taken of the rubella powder which did worke: butt nott downwards; but by glisters shee kepes her body solabell. The greatest payne shee now hath is in her arems, and most in her right arme which she cannot stire or move.”

Esther rallied once again. By the end of that summer, Smith wrote  that 

     My wiufe is much betred by those mdnes you sent her. Shee is lame in one arme most and full of payne, butt the swelling is abated by menes of oplying that salve one a plaster you sent her..Shee hath taken of your fisicke also several times. She is much betred, tho wecke as yet and full of payne, in her right aram espessly having a kind of numb coldness in her thyes & hips & body. Her bely payne is gone… [xxii]

And by December, Esther was well on the way to recovery. Her relieved husband thanks Winthrop

     …for all you(r) love and favour extended in her extreme ilnes, which nowe is much a bated, and shee mends and gaynes a litell strainth in her armes, although usles as to doe aney thing at present. Her stomoke is pretty good & takes rest, so I hope shee maye recover.

In a postscript, howver, he suggested that darker times were yet ahead:

”Our Indyans hath done us dameg: by stelte hath nowe & then killed us sume catell, butt we are not att present capabell to right our selves on them, butt hope with Coneticott asistanc in time shall.[xxiii]”   

In February of 1674, Smith sent Winthrop a message that both had fallen ill once more, Esther with her usual maladies, and Richard with a recurring bout with kidney stones. A “phiseke” sent by the doctor allowed him to “ make water…a good quantity att once came freely from me and with it sume small stones and gravel, sume of the biggest I have inclosed sent…”

As for Esther,

      Shee is much amended of what formerly, having use nowe of her hands, although butt weacke. She useth you(r) oyntment one her armes,, & you(r) black salve shee constantly aployes to the baikes of her hands one playstars.  She cannot well clinch her hands nor bowe them downwards from the wrist when clinched, which makes  me thinke sume senews maye be shrunken it…Shee hath a numbnedse in her thyes still, butt not constant…Shee is latly troubled with much payne in her bones night times, having nowe not anney  phisick this winter, butt intends to take some shortly. The payne lyes in her baick, shoulder, and necke nights times…[xxiv]

With the letter, Esther included a few gifts in appreciation of medicines he had sent previously, namely seven cheeses, and two turkeys, as well as a firkin of sugar received from the West Indies.

The modern reader of Esther’s trials can only assume that much of the time she was incapacitated during these recurring bouts of illness, yet the life and production of the farm went on as usual. 

During this period, visitors came to Cocumscussoc from near and far, Richard writing several times to Winthrop of acquaintances dropping by. Smith’s Castle also served as a place of negotiations between Rhode Island authorities and parties associated with the Atherton purchase. Smith was also for a time named magistrate for Narragansett Country, and the manor house was then the scene of inquiry. This is what we know of today as the sitting of a “grand jury”. Sea Captains bound for Wickford would anchor off Cocumscussoc and be rowed ashore to visit the estate. Even Roger Williams came occasionally to preach to the Narragansett who were inclined to hear of this “religion from across the sea”. He was well received:

”Mr. Williams doeth exaceys amongst us and sayeth he will contuny itt; he precheth well and abell, and much pepell comes to hear him to theyr good satisfaction”. 

 One of his visits to Cocumscussoc was in June of 1675 while Richard Smith was away on business at Long Island. Esther received him cordially, and he later commented about her that, ”Mrs. Smith, though too much favouring the Foxians (called Quakers),… is a notable Spirit for Coutesie toward strangers…[xxv]

In spite of her infirmities, there is, in fact, evidence that Friends meetings were actually held at the house on at least two occasions during Esther’s time as matron of the “great house”.  In 1672, during the visit of Quaker minister George Fox to Rhode Island, he was accompanied by Governor Easton into Narragansett Country where he held a meeting with ”people of Connecticut and other parts round about”. Fox would record that their meeting was held “at a justices where Friends never had any before, but he had been “invited to come again”. The justice at this time in Narragansett Country was Richard Smith Jr. as he had been appointed the seat of Magistrate. Fox would not return, but he recommended the site to his fellow missionary John Burnyeat, who recorded some time later that while on a trip to Connecticut, “…We had a meeting at one Richard Smith’s , and next day took our journey towards Hartford.[xxvi]

Williams’ mention of Esther’s Quaker leanings likely gives some insight to her interactions with the indigenous people, whose messengers carried news of her condition and returned with medicines for her treatment. Her Quaker beliefs also give a possible clue as to why Richard added a provision in his will, proved in 1660, to free Ceaser and Sarah, upon his death, giving them 100 acres of land. The will also manumitted their three children when they reached the age of thirty. Het set Ebed Melich free upon his death as well, and the former slave would appear in a court case early in the 18thcentury, represented by none other than Richard Smith’s great nephew, Daniel Updike.

Esther left Cocumscussoc when the threat what is now called King Philip’s War was imminent. On June 27, 1675, Roger Williams would write to Winthrop that 

“Yesterday Mrs. Smith (after more yea most of the Women and children were gone) departed in a great shoare (shower), by land, for Newport, to take boat in a vessel 4 mile from her howse[xxvii]” Richard Smith and some of the other men remained on the estate as long as conditions allowed.

Smith, despite his earlier attempts to mediate between authorities, ultimately supported the United Colonies militia who came in December, 1676 to initiate a raid against the neutral Narragansett at the Great Swamp. He was involved in ferrying Massachusetts troops into Rhode Island and allowed the encampment of the United Colonies soldiers on the premises. In retaliation for the hundreds of innocent indigenous people killed and captured at the Great Swamp, the block house that Smith had inherited was burned to the ground in the spring of 1676 by Narragansett warriors.

Smith would not return until two years later, his house presumably rebuilt in a large salt-box style, with two gables on either side of the front entrance, and a long, sloping roof in back. It is not clear whether Esther was with Smith when he wrote to Winthrop again in June of 1678, but it seems the house has not yet been finished, as the ”Rhode Island men intends to kepe Courtt att Thomas Goulds house fryday next or saterdaye…”, hearings that were previously held at Smith’s house.

By May of 1679, he mentions Esther once more in salutations, in a letter to New London, and in subsequent letters to Winthrop discussing the leasing of land on Boston Neck, and the building of boats for the governor, there is not a word of illness or ailment. Esther’s trials seemed to be over at last. 

In May of 1682, Smith wrote:

     Worthy Sir,. my self and my wiufes servis to you & gives you thainks for all you(r) kind favors. You(r) by Robert Sinomen recd. Fower dayes since I sawe you(r) indyan, who intends to come to you & his wiufe, as he sayeth, this wecke. I looke for him over here everey daye, in order to his gooeing to you & have promised him to write to you by him in favor of him. I shall be glad to see you here & from hense shall waigt one you where you please.[xxviii]

The last known letter from Smith to Winthrop came from Cocumscussoc on July 15th 1684, in which he sends greetings “from me & myne to you and your(r) in hops that this will find you in good health as we are…” There are still grumblings about disputes and Rhode Island claims, but a contentedness seems to have come with age and finally, good health. Not forgetting his friend and physician all these years, Richard Smith closes his letter to Winthrop, 

”My wiufe presents her humbell servis to you & you(r) frends & so doth him who will ever owne himselvfe you(r) obliged frend & servent”.

In his will, Richard left the Plantation to Esther, though it is unclear whether she would have stayed at Cocumscussoc on her own. Most accounts say that Esther died before Richard’s death in 1692. One genealogical account puts Esther’s death at 1699. Both Esther and Richard Smith are believed to have been buried in the Ayrault-Congdon-Updike lot on what was then the property of the Castle, though any remains of the markers are their graves have long disappeared. 


[i] Dunay, Neil, Captives at Cocumscussoc: From Bondage to Freedom from Cranston, G. Timothy We Were Here Too: Selected Stories of Black History in North Kingstown CreateSpace 2016 p. 68

[ii] Updike, David Berkley Richard Smith First Settler of the Narragansett Country, 

Rhode Island Boston, The Merrymount Press 1937 p. 79

[iii] Ibid.  79

[iv] Ibid.  80

[v] Ibid. 81

[vi] Ibid. 82

[vii] Ibid 83

[viii] Ibid. 83

[ix] Ibid. 84

[x] Ibid. 84

[xi] Ibid. 85

[xii] Ibid. 86

[xiii] Ibid. 86

[xiv] Ibid. 88

[xv] Ibid. 88

[xvi] Ibid. 93

[xvii] Ibid. 94

[xviii] Ibid. 95

[xix] Ibid. 96

[xx] Ibid. 97

[xxi] Ibid. 98

[xxii] Ibid. 99

[xxiii] Ibid. 101

[xxiv] ibid. 102

[xxv] LaFantasie, Glenn The Correspondence of Roger Williams Providence, Rhode Island Historical Society Vol. 2 p. 693

[xxvi] Woodward, Carl, Jr. Plantation in Yankeeland Wickford, The Cocumscussoc Association 1971 p. 34

[xxvii] Lafantasie, Vol. 2. p. 698

[xxviii] Updike, D.B. Richard Smith… p. 118


Sarah Updike Goddard: Colonial Woman of the Press

by John Dower


by Marilyn Harris

The Providence River during the colonial era. Courtesy of the John Carter Brown Library.

   Sarah Updike Goddard, although mentioned in, among others, Notable American Women, Rhode Island Founders from Settlement to Statehood, American National Biography and 18th Century American Women, as well as in numerous books and historical studies of colonial printing, has remained largely unknown. At a time when it was rare for women to be involved in business outside the home and late in her life, she became the second printer in Providence (the first being her son), and owner/editor of the Providence Gazette, a woman more than able to run a business on her own. Her devotion to the “mystick art of printing”i was second only to her devotion to family and friends. 

     Through both her mother and father, who were first cousins, Sarah traced her ancestry back to Richard Smith, Sr. and his wife, Johan. In the 1630s the Smiths brought five children to the New World, two sons and three daughters, including the two who would become Sarah’s grandmothers: Katherine Smith Updike and Joan Smith Newton. When Richard Smith, Jr. died without children in 1692, Smith Castle and their Cocumscussoc property passed to Katherine’s oldest son, Lodowick Updike, who had married Joan’s daughter Abigail Newton. 

     Sarah Updike Goddard was one of seven children born to Lodowick and Abigail (Newtown) Updike. At that time there was no official registry of birthdates. Estimated dates were often calculated from subsequent events. For example, The Op Dyck Genealogy probably assumed her position in the family (See Figure 1) because of the order in which the heirs were listed in both parents’ wills.ii

  Further, sources generally placed her year of birth “around” 1700, largely based on the fact that her well-known son William was verifiably born in 1740 and she was assumed not to have given birth much after the age of 40.iii 

     On the other hand, numerous sources referred to her having been educated with her brothers or by her older brothers’ tutors. However, using their given birthdates, they would have been well into their educations before she was even born; therefore, it is possible that she was born at least a few years earlier. In any case, Sarah’s roots were firmly buried in Rhode Island colonial history. 

     Growing up as a child in Smith’s Castle (or Updike Mansion as it came to be known), Sarah Updike was at the beginning of the Narragansett Plantation era, entering a world of wealth and privilege. In addition to her six siblings, Sarah was part of a large extended family, including the children of her married older brothers and sister, and numerous aunts and uncles with their own large families. There was probably no shortage of family events to attend in addition to opportunities to visit and be visited by other plantation families and to participate in Newport society. Like other young women of her social class, she was home- schooled, but “Sarah’s education included not only the subjects usual to the day but also French and Latin from tutors who lived in the Updike household.”iv 

     As was said of her brother’s education, “Such an education bespeaks a household with financial means and intellectual interests far beyond the average.”v 

  Sarah and her family, as well as many other Narragansett Planters, were members of the Anglican Church and religious services at St. Paul’s Church would have been a large part of her life. After years of meeting in private homes, Old St. Paul’s Church (Naraggansett Church) had been erected at a site a few miles from Smith’s Castle, funded “. . . . by the voluntary contributions of the Inhabitants. . . .”vi (i.e., the Plantation owners). 

     In 1721 Rev. James MacSparran came to Narragansett and succeeded Rev. Christopher Bridge as the second rector. After marrying into the wealthy Gardiner family, he lived the life of a country gentleman and slave-owner, serving as their religious leader for over thirty-six years. In 1735 it was Dr. MacSparran who officiated at Sarah’s wedding. 

While many of Sarah’s extended family lived in close proximity, there were other branches scattered throughout New England and even in the southern colonies. With few good roads, most travel, at least to those homes within a reasonable distance, would have been made on horseback. Sarah probably learned to ride on a now-extinct horse breed known as the Narragansett Pacer, first recognized as a breed the year she was born. It was eminently suited to the muddy cowpaths that often served as Rhode Island roads.

      There is some question as to how Sarah met her future husband, Dr. Giles Goddard. In 1720 Sarah’s older sister Esther had married Thomas Fosdick, a physician from New London, Connecticut. They had four children over the next ten years, so it is not unlikely that Sarah would have gone to visit their family. “Probably Sarah met Giles [Goddard] during visits to her sister Esther and therefore did not come as a total stranger to New London after her marriage.vii 

     On the other hand, there is an indication in her obituary that Sarah spent some years of her youth in Boston, probably with her great-aunt Elizabeth Viall’s family. Her mother Abigail had lived with Aunt Elizabeth in her teens as well. It may have been there that they became acquainted since we know Giles was originally from Boston. In any case, the following record of her wedding appeared in the Rhode Island, Vital Extracts: 

UPDIKE, Sarah, of Capt. Lodowick, and Dr. Giles Goddard of Groton, married at the home of the bride by Dr. James MacSparran Dec. 11, 1735viii

  Unlike Massachusetts Puritans, Anglican worshippers celebrated Christmas so Smith Castle would probably have been beautifully decorated as the family welcomed the many wedding guests. Perhaps there was even snow to soften the landscape. Sarah’s aged father and mother were alive to celebrate with the young couple and their mutual friend Dr. MacSparran officiated at the ceremony. 

     Gravely missed, however, was her older brother Richard, who had died suddenly the previous spring, leaving a large family. This was particularly hard on Sarah’s father, who came to rely ever more heavily on Sarah’s brother Daniel for help with the management of the plantation. Probably soon after celebrating the Twelve Days of Christmas with family and friends, Sarah and her new husband left for Connecticut where Giles was establishing himself as a physician. 

     Dr. Giles Goddard was born in 1703, the second of four sons of William and Elizabeth (Fairfield) Goddard, both born in Boston, as were Giles and his siblings. There are no records as to Dr. Goddard’s training as a physician; it is possible that he attended medical school in Boston, but it is more likely that he apprenticed with an established doctor for a period of time. In any case, he showed up as a young doctor in Groton, Connecticut in 1725 when he is recorded as participating in a subscription to build a church “conforming to Church of England laws. . . .”ix 

    Rev. James McSparran (also Sarah’s minister back in Wickford) had for several years been making occasional visits to New London to minister to Giles and a group of fellow believers, who now proposed to erect an Episcopal house of worship, which would become St. James Church. 

  In the first few years after their 1735 marriage, Sarah and Giles lived in Groton, a small seaport village just across the Thames River from New London. The next few years were a time of great joy and great sorrow for the couple. In 1736 their first child, Catherine, was born, but died at the age of two months. Soon afterwards, Sarah also lost her father Lodowick at the age of almost 92. In 1738, their daughter Katherine Mary Goddard was born, probably also in Groton. By 1740, the Goddard family was in New London, where William was born. There was apparently one more child born in 1742, who also died, followed in a few years by Sarah’s mother. By 1743 the Goddards lived in a house on Bradley Street, not far from the newly constructed St. James Episcopal Church. In addition to practicing medicine, Giles served as New London’s postmaster. 

     Much of what is known of Giles Goddard comes from the 1735-1757 diary entries of a New Londoner, Joshua Hempstead, who apparently was a patient as well as a friend. While many of his entries did not give much detail, ”I was up to Doctr [sic] Goddards in the middle of the Day,”x there were a few that provided a glimpse into the doctor’s medical practices. One such entry reported: 

I sent for Doctor Goddard & he came & considered my Case and Says tis the Same Distemper that hath of late prevailed among Children & Directs to a drink of Strong Tea made of the bark of Sassafrax [sic] Roots boiled with Lignum vitia Saw dust.xi

Although this may sound strange to modern ears, Lignum Vitae (Latin for "wood of life") came from a Caribbean hard wood and chips of the wood were used at the time to brew a tea for treatment of a variety of medical conditions from coughs to arthritis. 

    During those years Sarah was involved with her growing family, helping her husband build his practice, and with the community, social and church responsibilities expected of the well-educated wife of a prominent citizen of New London. As was common for the time, she educated her children at home. Judging by their future accomplishments, she did a fine job preparing them for careers reflecting her and Giles’ interests in both printing and the postal system. 

  By the time his son William was a teenager, Giles Goddard was becoming increasingly incapacitated by gout and more and more responsibility was falling upon Sarah, including taking over the duties of postmaster in Groton. In 1755 they made the decision to place William as an apprentice to James Parker who, in partnership with John Holt, had established the Connecticut Gazette newspaper in New Haven. Interestingly, Parker and Holt also served as postmaster and deputy postmaster respectively. This combination of printing and postal service was not uncommon at the time as it gave a printer ready access to news from around the colonies. 

    The Goddards were to continue this practice in succeeding years. Two years into Williams’ apprenticeship, his father Giles died in New London. 

The diarist Hempstead recorded the death of Dr. Giles Goddard on January 31, 1757: 

“. . . aged between 50 & 60. He hath been decrepid with the Gout &c Several years & of late Confined to his house & Bed.”xii 

     Dr. Goddard left his widow with a sizeable inheritance with which she was able to maintain the home in New London for herself and her daughter while William was completing his apprenticeship. During this time, Parker and Holt had also established the New York Gazette and William was able to gain valuable experience at that enterprise as well. William’s apprenticeship ended in 1762 and the family’s future brought them back to Rhode Island. 

    The population of Providence in 1762 was around 4000. There was only one house on Westminster Street and carriages could not travel above Empire Street because of a hill. Although it was the second largest city in Rhode Island, Providence was largely over- shadowed by Newport. There were two political factions in the colony: the Newport faction headed by Samuel Ward and the Providence faction led by Stephen Hopkins. These two men alternated as governor several times between 1758 and 1767 as the power shifted between them as well as between their two cities. 

    The printing of business, government and legal forms formed a large part of a colonial printing enterprise, eliminating the need for laborious longhand copying. However, because there was no printing press in Providence, all government printing jobs were sent to Newport and the recently established Newport Mercury, the only newspaper in the colony, was the mouthpiece of Samuel Ward. Stephen Hopkins felt it was time to overcome this handicap and he began a search for a printer to open shop in Providence; he chose William Goddard. 

     At the age of approximately 62, Sarah Updike Goddard embarked on a new phase of her life. Within a few months of the end of William’s apprenticeship, she financed her son’s establishment of the first printing and publishing business in Providence. Sarah invested 300 pounds, almost half of the inheritance she had received from Giles, for this startup. Further, Sarah and Mary Katherine moved to Providence to support the day-to-day operation of the business, which included a book and stationery store as well as the printing shop. 

       “In the conduct of this first printing venture . . . begun in July 1762, Goddard was aided by the business acumen, good judgment, and strong maternal affection of Sarah, his mother, and by the practical skill in printing, soon acquired, of his sister Mary Katherine.” xiii The first publication under the William Goddard imprint was a broadside announcing the Fall of Morro Castle at Havana followed by a theatrical playbill.xiv 

  On October 20 1762, (William’s 22nd birthday) the first issue of Providence’s first newspaper, the Providence Gazette and Country Journal, was published with Sarah and Mary Katherine’s help. During its years of publication, the 4-page weekly newspaper included: Page 1 – largely London news; Page 2 - clippings from other colonial papers and reports brought in by sea captains; Page 3 - entertainment pieces such as poems and essays and opinion pieces (usually anonymous or with a pseudonym) with the last column largely advertisements; Page 4 - public announcements and advertisements. 

     It is entirely possible that Sarah contributed anonymous essays to the newspapers. It is probable that she managed the financial affairs since William’s later financial problems did not indicate a great interest or expertise in that part of the business. She certainly promoted his interests through her extended Rhode Island family connections and social contacts, The Goddard press was responsible for the publication the following year of the first of Benjamin West’s Rhode Island Almanacs, calculated specifically for the meridian of Providence with the tides of Narragansett Bay and other pertinent information for the farmers and mariners of Rhode Island.xv 

    Some feel that Sarah, with her plantation and mercantile background, was instrumental in suggesting the need for this useful publication to her son. As the colonies moved toward the Revolutionary War, political essays crept in, fueling the movement toward independence. 

  The years 1764-1765 were volatile times in the colonies. The Stamp Act and colonial opposition to it played an important role in defining some of those grievances which eventually led to the break with England. In December of 1764 an influential pamphlet in opposition to the Stamp Act written by Stephen Hopkins (The Rights of Colonies Examined) was printed by Goddard. Issues of the Gazette in the succeeding months frequently contained articles or pseudonymous letters commenting on the pamphlet or on the Stamp Act itself. 

     While interest in the topic was heated, it apparently did not do much to increase the paper’s subscription list. It was not long after this that William decided to leave Providence in search of more lucrative business opportunity. He suspended publication of the Gazette and left for New York. His mother, with the assistance of Mary Katherine, took over the operation of the printing and publishing business, the book and stationery shop, the paper mill, which they had purchased, and the postmaster position in his absence. 

  The extent to which William was involved in the Providence firm after May 1765 is unclear. William himself was not forthright about the arrangements. In The Partnership (a book he later wrote describing difficulties with his Philadelphia partners) he stated: “And whereas the said Sarah Goddard held and possesses in partnership [italics mine] with William Goddard, a printing office at Providence . . . . “xvi which makes her sound as having equal authority. In another place in that same book, however, William says:

“At that time I had a very complete office in Providence under the superintendence of Mrs. Sarah Goddard, my mother . . . [italics mine]. “ 

  The words “I” and “superintendence” seems to imply he viewed her more as an employee. We do know that William had joined the New York printing shop of John Holt in New York as a silent partner. Although he visited Providence frequently and may have provided some guidance, Sarah was increasingly in charge of the Providence firm. 

    In late 1765 and early 1766, while William traveled regularly between New York and Providence, the firm’s publications bore the imprint Sarah & William Goddard (sometimes S. & W. Goddard), the first time Sarah’s name appeared in connection with the business and making her officially the second printer in Providence. The output included West’s Almanac for 1766, a 60-page theological pamphlet, broadsides and sermons. On August 24, 1765 A Providence Gazette, Extraordinary (headed Vox Populi, Vox Dei) was printed. It was a special edition, devoted almost exclusively to opposition of the Stamp Act. 

   Printers, publishers, and lawyers were the most negatively affected by the Act which required that newspapers and other documents be printed on stamped paper from England. Publications from the Goddard print shop became increasingly pro-Whig. The debate over the Stamp Act probably made for some interesting discussions at Updike family gatherings as much of the extended family considered themselves Loyalists.

  Another significant publication advancing the colonials’ opposition to the Stamp Act was a pamphlet, “A Discourse Addressed to the Sons of Liberty at a Solemn Assembly near Liberty Tree in Newport, February 14 1766,” published under the imprint of William and Sarah Goddard. This was credited with sparking the formation of similar groups in other colonies. xvii 

     The year 1766 was a busy one at Sarah Goddard and Company, the “company” being her daughter, Mary Katherine, an active wielder of a printer’s stick. There was enough work to warrant an assistant; Samuel Inslee was hired. In addition to the usual broadsides, sermons, and almanacs, Sarah published the first American edition of Lady M--y W----y M------ e: Letters . . Written During Her Travels in Europe, Asia and Africa. Lady Wortley’s letters to female friends in the volume provided “. . . intimate glimpses into the women’s world of Eastern Europe and the Middle East”xviii and were immensely popular. This was an ambitious project for a small printer, being over 200 pages long.

  Meanwhile, the Goddard Bookshop imported books from London, offering its Providence customers contact with the outside intellectual world. And it did not just offer the usual religious books; the shop stocked titles such as the Tattler (a British literary and society journal), Tom Jones, The Rambler (a series of short papers by Samuel Johnson), and The Adventures of Roderick Random (a picaresque novel by Tobias Smollett).xix 

  The choices were undoubtedly reflective of Sarah’s wide-ranging literary interests. Under Sarah’s supervision, even the paper mill was beginning to show a slight profit. On August 9, 1766, Sarah was able to revive the weekly Providence Gazette. In the usual page one “Notice to the Public” she indicated that, even though William had not considered the paper a profitable enterprise, she was going ahead with it anyway, thinking it was important for the community. 

    Being a careful businesswoman, however, she did require that one-half the annual subscription cost had to be paid on receiving the first issue and that “provisions, grain of any kind, tallow, wood, wool and many other articles of country produce” would be accepted in lieu of money.xx 

     By the end of 1766 William was in Philadelphia making plans for his newest venture in partnership with Joseph Galloway and Thomas Wharton. In January, 1767 Sarah was probably proud when she reprinted a notice announcing the forthcoming appearance of her son’s Philadelphia newspaper, The Pennsylvania Chronicle and Universal Advertiser. “Modeling his plans upon the London Chronicle, Goddard tried to make his Chronicle the paper of his dreams”xxi -- a large folio with four columns instead of the usual three. It was considered the best colonial newspaper of its time and had the largest circulation. 

  The owners of the rival Philadelphia Journal, in part probably nervous about his success, began to criticize articles in Goddard’s paper, particularly those defending Benjamin Franklin. A newspaper war ensued for several weeks in the spring of 1767. William, who later claimed that it was at the insistence of his partners, inserted an attack on the various writers of the Journal, signed Lex Talionis (the Biblical law of eye for an eye). 

  After its publication, Sarah wrote a lengthy letter to her disputatious son, expressing her concern and disapproval of the Lex Talionis article and urging forbearance. In part, she advised: 

 “It is with aching heart and trembling hand I attempt to write, but hardly able, for the great concern and anxious fears the sight of your late Chronicles gave me to find you deeper and deeper in an unhappy uncomfortable situation. In your calm hours of reflection, you must see the impropriety of publishing such pieces . . . . attacking writers of one of the opposition newspapers. . . for everyone who takes delight in publicly or privately taking away any person’s good name, or striving to render him ridiculous, are in the gall of bitterness, and in the bonds of iniquity, whatever their pretense may be for it. . . . I heartily wish it was within the reach of my faint efforts to convey to you what threescore and almost ten years experience has taught me, of the mere nothingness of all you are disputing about, and the infinite importance and value of what you thereby neglect and disregard . . . the law of universal love . . . . xxii

     Apparently he took her rebuke to heart and they reconciled, because starting in June, she regularly included articles from the Chronicle on the pages of the Gazette. 

    In August John Carter came from Benjamin Franklin’s Philadelphia office to work with her and soon afterwards became her partner. The Gazette was now published under the imprint of Sarah Goddard and John Carter. 

  In addition to her business skills, Sarah possessed a high degree of interest in and knowledge of the political scene. In December of 1767 the Chronicle was the first in the colonies to publish John Dickinson’s “Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania to the Inhabitants of the British Colonies,” a series of 12 essays written by a Pennsylvania lawyer and legislator. Sarah recognized their importance and wrote to her son: 

 “Our friend Judge Chase and I think it would be a good scheme in you to print the Farmer’s letters in a pamphlet, and that soon, as they appear to be the completest pieces ever wrote on the subject in America. They are universally admired here.xxiii 

  Dickinson’s letters were widely reprinted and read throughout the colonies and were recognized as important in uniting the colonists against the Townshend Acts. It would indeed have been highly profitable for William to publish those pamphlets. Unfortunately, his partners did not share his political views and opposed the project, further increasing the friction present almost from the beginning of their partnership. 

     The year 1768 was to bring another great change in Sarah’s life. Possibly in the belief that Sarah might moderate her son’s ideas, in May Galloway and Wharton proposed that William should sell the Providence business and move his mother and sister to Philadelphia. “They promised to ‘take a genteel house’ for the family and to ‘advance a sum sufficient to set up her [Sarah Goddard] in a store of books and stationery.’ Money was also to be allowed to the mother ‘for her superintendence of family affairs.’” xxiv 

     At first, William was opposed to the idea, but he was eventually convinced that it was in his best interests. He wrote to Sarah, who replied that she preferred to remain in Providence: 

. . . . for my life is almost at a close, and I can hardly think of removing so near the period of my days into a strange part of the world, to launch a new set of acquaintance, and to leave all my former ones, the companions of my youth, and the supporters of my old age . . . .xxv

  At the urging of his partners, William went to see her in person. Later he wrote: “This I did and laid the prospect before her and she from motives of maternal tenderness consented to leave an easy agreeable situation and a multitude of amicable friends, and my sister agreed to accompany her.”xxvi William relinquished his position of postmaster, which Sarah had been maintaining in his absence, and the November 5th issue of the Providence Gazette carried Sarah’s farewell to Providence.xxvii It was obviously hard for Sarah to leave. 

  A week later the print shop and the Providence Gazette was sold to John Carter for $550.00 (it remained in his possession until 1814). Things did not go as planned in Philadelpia. According to William’s later account, his partners Galloway and Wharton did not follow through on their promises to provide suitable housing for the Goddards and William was forced to make the arrangements himself. Also according to William, Wharton then objected to his choices, saying: “A house in an alley would answer thy purpose well enough” to which William replied, “. . . as we did not come out of an alley, we will not be driven into one . . . .”xxviii Apparently, Wharton also objected to a small press which Sarah had received for the purpose of printing forms from home; she returned it. In late 1769, Sarah wrote to her sister about the physical difficulties she had adjusting to life in Philadelphia: 

 “This Serves to Acquaint you that altho I have been much indisposed this winter, that through the goodness of God I am in a better State of Health than I have been for Sometime when I first came to this City the Air and Climate did not seem to agree with me. If I Stay I hope it will become more Natural.”xxix 

     In December Sarah deeded the remaining Connecticut properties she had inherited from her husband to William, in return for which he promised to allow her support from the Philadelphia shop. During William’s frequent trips, some on postal business and some of which involved his continuing partnership and financial problems, Sarah and Mary Katherine maintained the Philadelphia office, newspaper and shop as they had done earlier in Providence. 

Early in January, 1770, while William was traveling in New York, he received a letter from his mother offering sympathy and support for his current difficulties and reassuring him that the Philadelphia Chronicle was doing well, with new subscriptions every day. The very next day he received word from a friend that his mother had died on Friday, January 5th. Mary Katherine also wrote, urging him to return to Philadelphia as soon as possible. 

     Sarah Updike Goddard was buried on Sunday, January 7, 1770 in Christ Church’s Burial Ground, 5th & Arch Streets, Philadelphia.  A lengthy anonymous memorial appeared in the January 20, 1770 issue of the New York Gazette (later reprinted in the February 10, 1770 Providence Gazette). Such a long obituary was unusual in the 18th century for anyone, much less a woman. The anonymous author, saying he was “no relation to the family and ... not intimately acquainted. . . “after a biographical summary, ended by writing: 

. . . . Her uncommon attainments in literature were the least of valuable parts of her character. Her conduct through all the changing trying scenes of life, was not only unblameable, but even exemplary – a sincere piety, an unaffected humility, an easy agreeable cheerfulness and affability, an entertaining, sensible and edifying conversation, and a prudent attention to all the duties of domestic life, endeared her to all her acquaintance, especially in the relations of wife, parent, friend and neighbour. The death of such a person is a public loss, an irreparable one to her children! xxx 

  Some have criticized the eulogy, as not giving Sarah enough credit for her part in her son’s career and in the colonial newspaper and printing worlds; she probably would have considered it the highest compliment since it stressed her personal, rather than business, traits. 

  Her children’s future successes would probably have brought great joy to her. Mary Katherine continued to run businesses for her brother for many years and excelled as a publisher of several of his newspapers, became Baltimore’s first postmaster, and became famous for publishing the first signed copy of the Declaration of Independence, at some risk to her own life. 

     William, besides his printing and publishing career, was recognized as an American patriot of the Pre- and Revolutionary Period and as creator of the Constitutional Post for intercolonial mail service. When the Postal Service Act was passed in 1792, his ideals of open communication and freedom from governmental interference formed the basis of the new system, although to his disappointment Benjamin Franklin, rather than he, was appointed First Postmaster General. Later in life, William married Abigail Angell and they had one son and four daughters, who carried Sarah’s ideals into future generations. 

END NOTES

 i From Poem in Providence Gazette, March 17, 1765.

 ii Charles Wilson Opdyke, The Op Dyck Genealogy (Albany, NY: Week, Parsons & Co., 1889), pp. 91-93.

 iii Opdyke, op cit., p. 87.

 iv Ward L. Miner, “Goddard, Sarah Updike,” Notable American Women, Vol. II, p. 56-57/ 

v Ward L. Miner, William Goddard, Newspaperman (Duke University Press: Durham, NC, 1962), p. 11-12. 

vi Woodard, p. 66.

 vii Miner, William Goddard, Newspaperman, p. 11. 

viii Rhode Island, Vital Extracts, 1636-1899 [database on-line], Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014 (accessed 2/18/2018).

 ix Ed. Benjamin Tinkham Marshall, A Modern History of New London County, Connecticut.Vol. I (New York: Lewis Historical Publishing, 1922, p.388. (Excerpt from Diary of Joshua Hempstead).

 x Miner, William Goddard: Newspaperman, p. 9.

 xi Ibid. 

xii Ibid., p. 11.

 xiii Lawrence C. Wroth, The First Press in Providence. Presented at the Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society, 1942, p. 356.

 xiv Rhode Island Imprints (1727-1800), Printed for the Rhode Island Historical Society, 1915. 

xv Wroth, p. 361. xvi William Goddard, The Partnership (William Goddard: Philadelphia, 1770), p. 26. 

xvii The John Carter Library Website, Pamphlet Wars: Arguments on Paper from the Age of Revolutions, [It is possible to view the entire scanned pamphlet at this site], Accessed on 4/3/2018. http://www.brown.edu/ Facilities/John_Carter_Brown_Library/exhibitions/pamphletWars/pages/crisis.html

xviii Ken J. Bates, A Colonial Woman’s Bookshelf (Eugene, Oregon: Wipf & Stock, 1996), pp.120-121. 

xix Wroth, p. 379. 

xx Printers and Printing in Providence, Prepared by a Committee of Providence Typographical Union No. 33 as a Souvenir of the Fiftieth Anniversary of Its Institution (Providence, RI: 1907), p. 12 

xxi Miner, p. 68. X

xii Quoted in Miner, pp. 75-76. 

xxiii Quoted in Miner, p. 82. 

xxiv Miner (with quotations), p. 84. 

xxv Quoted in Miner, p. 84. xxvi Goddard, op cit.

 xxvii Providence Gazette, Saturday, November 5, 1768, Issue 252, Page 3 Image from Genealogy Bank.com, Accessed 4/16/2018. 

xxviii Goddard, p. 22. 

xxix March 14, 1769 Letter, Updike Manuscript and Autograph Collection, Providence Public Library.

 xxx Quoted in Wilkins Updike, Esq. Memoirs of the Rhode-Island Bar (Boston: Thomas H. Webb, 1842), p. 256- 257.

“Shakespeare’s Head” today courtesy the Providence Preservation Society.


The First People of African Descent at Smith's Castle

by John Dower in


By John Dower

In celebration of Black History Month and the launch of our blog, the Cocumscussoc Review, it seems appropriate for one of our first articles to go back to the beginning of the history of the people of African descent that lived and toiled at Smith’s Castle. However, we quickly are faced with a question- When did Blacks first live at Cocumscussoc? Historians recognize Richard Smith Sr. as the first Englishman to acquire an extensive estate in Narragansett Country. He is also acknowledged to have been the first of the Narragansett Planters. Nevertheless, we know little surrounding this “emergence” of Cocumscussoc as a plantation, “a major agricultural enterprise” utilizing enslaved labor, which would eventually comprise a tract of land some three miles wide and nine miles long.[i]

 We know with certainty, thanks to the will of Richard Smith Jr., that he owned eight enslaved people in 1692, but we know very little of them other than the adults were named Ebed Melich, Caesar, and Sarah. It is also known that Caesar and Sarah were the parents of the five unnamed children that appear in the will. While the will of Richard Smith Jr. provides concrete evidence of people of African ancestry living at Cocumscussoc by 1692, it does little to establish the arrival time of the first Blacks at the great house on Mill Cove. Clearly, the eight enslaved individuals in the will had not just arrived at Smith's Castle in 1692. But when did they appear, or were they even the first Blacks in the Smith household? To attempt to answer that question, we must investigate the life of Richard Smith Sr. to see if we can find some answers.

 Richard Smith Sr. arrived at Cocumscussoc sometime in the late 1630s by way of England, Taunton, and Portsmouth; and set up a trading operation with the Narragansett people alongside his associate and fellow Englishman, Roger Williams. Neither man lived permanently at Cocumscussoc at this time (both employing overseers tasked with running the day-to-day trading operations). Williams continued to make Providence his permanent residence, and Smith made his way to a Dutch-sponsored settlement on Long Island after initially living in Portsmouth. This early connection to the Dutch by Smith Sr. will prove crucial in understanding the role of Blacks in the history of Smith's Castle. Shortly after settling in 1642 at Mespath, now modern-day Queens, Smith and his neighbors were attacked by the Wappinger tribe and sought refuge in the larger Dutch settlement on the island of Manhattan. On Manhattan, Smith would form relationships with the Dutch that undoubtedly influenced the rise of plantation slavery in the Narragansett Country of Rhode Island and led to the first people of African descent at Cocumscussoc.[ii]

 For the six or so years that Smith and his family lived in New Amsterdam, the name given to Manhattan by the Dutch, Richard Sr. became more involved with the Dutch West India Company. Almost immediately, Smith was accepted into the company's inner circle, holding various offices of trust within the Dutch trading operation. From New Amsterdam, the patriarch of the Smith family was able to strengthen his trading opportunities for his post at Cocumscussoc, and at the same time learn about the expanding trade possibilities the Dutch had cultivated in the West Indies, especially with Barbados. During this same period, the elder Smith acquired a son-in-law when his daughter Catherine married a Dutchman that held a lofty position in the Dutch West India Company. Gysbert op den Dyke (later anglicized to Gilbert Updike) served on various councils for the company and was also the commander of Fort Good Hope (current day Hartford, Connecticut). By the time Updike married into the Smith family, he was already well acquainted with slavery. [iii]

 Interestingly, the Dutch West India Company had first brought enslaved Africans to New Amsterdam in 1626 and continued to expand their interests in slave trading in the following decades. By 1664 company ships carried as many as 300 enslaved people per voyage into New Amsterdam. Gilbert Updike is in Connecticut records for having been involved in the "accidental" death of his "black boy" in 1639, so we know with certainty that Updike was personally involved with slavery on some level. We have no direct evidence that Updike was still involved in slavery when he married into the Smith family; however, in the years following his marriage to Catherine, the Dutch West India Company became increasingly entangled in the business of slavery.[iv]

 The story of the Dutch West India Company very closely parallels the story of trade at Cocumscussoc during this period of the 1640s. Around 1640 the focus of the Dutch was on turning a quick profit dealing in beaver pelts and lumber. Not coincidentally, this was in the same wheelhouse of Richard Smith Sr. as he also traded with the Narragansett for pelts and had easy access to lumber as well. However, by the later part of the 1640s, beaver were becoming less plentiful due to over-trapping and restrictions on trading guns with the Indigenous people who supplied the pelts. No guns meant no beaver pelts. The Dutch began to promote agriculture over the fur trade, except they had one obstacle- a lack of a consistent labor force in their colony to work large farms necessary to be profitable. The obvious answer for the Dutch was to emulate the plantation operations they were supporting in Barbados. The Dutch West India Company was already deeply immersed in the slave trade, so promoting a plantation economy for their settlements was not unfamiliar to them.[v]

 For the better part of a decade, Richard Smith Sr. had been straddling two worlds, the Dutch colonialists and the English colonialists. He had been surprisingly successful at balancing his life within the two factions. Undoubtedly, Smith had seen the changes taking place around him by the late 1640s as trade in the previously lucrative fur market was in the early stages of decline. At the same time, the English were putting themselves in a position to take control over New Netherlands. Smith would have had a front-row seat in New Amsterdam to the Dutch transformation toward settlements based on plantation economies and the utilization of an enslaved labor force. Another situation was developing in Barbados during this same period. Every square mile on the island was being used to grow sugarcane, which meant that the planters of Barbados needed to import food to feed their growing workforce and other staples such as lumber and livestock. Colonists in Barbados pleaded with English authorities to lessen trade restrictions to no avail. So, the Dutch, who had long been involved in trade with Barbados and, in fact, had provided most of the enslaved Africans that worked the sugarcane fields, kept trade channels open. Richard Smith Sr. could not have avoided the changing economy when he made a pivotal decision sometime around 1648.[vi]  

When Richard Smith Sr. moved his family from New Amsterdam to Cocumscussoc sometime before 1650, it was a decision that was certainly not made lightly. Leaving the highly successful settlement on Manhattan to make a permanent residence at a trading post in Narragansett Country seems like a risky proposition at best. Perhaps the balancing act of being an Englishman in a Dutch colony was becoming too complicated. However, Richard Smith Jr. remained in New Amsterdam for another decade to assist his father in trade operations from the company offices while learning the ropes of trading with Barbados. Smith Sr. had long been a person to take chances to better himself financially, and this appears the case with a move to Cocumscussoc. The fact that he had been witnessing firsthand the rise of the plantation economy among the Dutch when fur trading was in flux cannot be ignored. Smith already had the necessary land to establish an agriculture operation and would soon be acquiring more property, as well as livestock. All that would be needed would be the labor to put a plantation in business.[vii]

 It is worth mentioning that in 1652, Rhode Island enacted the first ban on slavery in the colonies. The act stated- “Whereas there is a common course practised amongst Englishmen" to purchase enslaved people of African descent for free labor, and the government should therefore control it. The legislators set the length of servitude for Blacks and whites at a maximum of ten years or the enslaved’s twenty-fourth birthday. As we now know, the act was never enforced. Nevertheless, it seems that slavery was prevalent enough that some officials in Rhode Island felt it necessary to regulate the institution. Was Smith Sr. one of the Englishmen that caught the attention of the legislators when he made Cocumscussoc his final home?[viii]

 While it seems possible that Richard Smith Sr.’s permanent return to Rhode Island could have involved the practice of slavery based on his association with the Dutch while in New Amsterdam, we still have no documentation to support that premise. Within ten years of Smith’s return to Cocumscussoc, his son-in-law Gilbert Updike shows up at Cocumscussoc with his children following the death of his wife. We know that some twenty years prior, Updike had owned a young, enslaved man. Did Gilbert Updike introduce slavery to Smith’s Castle when he arrived in the late 1650s? During the 1650s, the Dutch increased the allotment of enslaved people from Africa and Barbados imported into New Amsterdam. Those associated with the Dutch West India Company were given priority to purchase enslaved workers when they arrived in the colonies, especially the “seasoned” laborers from Barbados. However, we still have no concrete evidence that the Smiths were involved in anything more than some continued trade with the Narragansett and the appearance of some agricultural enterprise, but not yet a plantation-based on enslaved labor.[ix]

Inventory from Daniel Updike’s 1757 will listing nineteen enslaved people.

Sometime in the early 1660s, Richard Smith Jr. left New Amsterdam to join his father at Cocumscussoc. If the elder Smith had witnessed the blossoming of plantations imitating those in Barbados based on an enslaved workforce, the younger Smith had seen plantation economies go into full bloom during his extra decade on Manhattan. By this time, trading in furs was indeed on its way out, and agricultural ventures were on the rise. During this period, the Smiths had also been fortunate enough to expand their landholdings, a strong indicator of what they believed would surely lead to their future success in Rhode Island. When Richard Smith Sr. died in 1666, there was still no concrete evidence in his will or otherwise that he had owned enslaved people. If the Smiths had been involved in slavery by 1666, a likely scenario suggested by Smith’s Castle historian Robert Geake is that Smith Jr. had been making trips to Barbados prior to his move to Rhode Island, where he would have acquired the first enslaved people to work at Cocumscussoc. Interestingly, the younger Smith had another brother-in-law, Thomas Newton, married to his sister Joan, who had moved to Barbados. Smith Jr. seemed to have the business of slavery all around him.[x]

 By 1665 the younger Richard Smith had a close relationship with John Winthrop Jr., governor of nearby Connecticut. Over the next several years, Smith discusses several topics associated with the slave trade with Winthrop, a known enslaver, but stops short of mentioning his ownership of human beings. These conversations are suggestive of someone who at the time would have thought of slavery as a relatively common occurrence in their life. Winthrop was also very involved in trade with Barbados, having a brother that was a planter and slaveholder residing on the island. Smith mentions his direct involvement in trade with Barbados and being unable to find a buyer for one of Winthrop's enslaved servants. We know that Smith Jr. lived among people who owned, imported, and traded in enslaved people for over two decades. However, we still do not have documentation proving the exact time when the younger Smith had become a slave owner himself.[xi]

 A closer inspection of the will of Richard Smith Jr. may shed some additional light on the first enslaved people of African descent making their appearance at Cocumscussoc. One important aspect of Smith Jr.’s will was his intent when the will was written in 1690 to free two enslaved adults, Caesar and Sarah, upon his death. In addition, he wanted the couple to be given 100 acres of land. It was also Smith's wish that Caesar and Sarah's five children were be given their freedom when they reached 30 years of age. Ebed Melich was also to be given his freedom upon turning 30 years old. The stipulations for Caesar and Sarah indicate that the couple had been with Smith Jr. for some time, and the owner had developed a relationship of sorts with the enslaved couple. It also seems more likely than not that the children were born during Caesar and Sarah's time at Cocumscussoc, instead of Smith acquiring them as an entire family group.[xii]

 The other enslaved adult at Smith’s Castle, Ebed Melich, would seemingly not have been part of the Smith household for very long as his freedom is put off until he reaches thirty. The apparent reason for Ebeb (a Biblical name meaning servant) having a surname is that he was owned by someone named Melich prior to being owned by Smith Jr. Melich is a name with various spellings, many of which were associated with the Dutch or Germans in the seventeenth century, not coincidently the two groups that comprised the early Dutch West India Company’s settlements in the New Netherlands. Smith Jr. had unlimited access to enslaved people at the time, so the purchase of Ebed points possibly to someone with unique skills. 

 Other puzzling questions arise concerning the will of Richard Smith Jr. Were the eight enslaved people listed in his will the only Blacks at Cocumscussoc at the time of Smith Jr.’s death? If so, how would a plantation economy at Cocumscussoc thrive with only three enslaved adults, all of whom were about to gain their freedom? A logical explanation can be found with the arrival of the Updikes at Smith’s Castle sometime around 1659 when Gilbert brought his wife and seven children there to live. Richard Smith’s wife, Joan, is thought to have died before that time, and their daughter Catherine, wife of Gilbert Updike, was deceased prior to 1664 when Smith Sr.’s will was written. It would not be out of the question for Gilbert Updike to have brought enslaved servants with him to assist in a household of seven children lacking in adult women. In fact, Roger Williams mentions in 1679 that Richard Smith Sr. did indeed have "servants," a word that was often synonymous with enslaved in the seventeenth century but could also pertain to white indentured servants.[xiii]

 When Richard Smith Sr. passed on in 1666, he left the main house and the majority of his land holdings to his son Richard Smith Jr.  He did, however, leave one-quarter of a newly acquired tract of land, as well as one-quarter of his livestock to his Updike grandchildren. Certainly, the eldest male, twenty-three-year-old Lodowick, would have been the principal benefactor of this bequest. Smith Jr. and his wife Esther never had children, so Lodowick became heir to Cocumscussoc. It seems doubtful that the enterprising, young Updike would have ignored the opportunity to begin emulating the agricultural operations he witnessed growing up in the New Netherlands. So, in the next thirty years, as he embraced the plantation business, it is very likely that Lodowick had long been assembling his own enslaved labor force at Cocumscussoc. While Richard Smith Jr. died owning only the eight enslaved people listed in his will, an adult Lodowick could have very easily been the owner of record for the many additional laborers needed to make Cocumscussoc the plantation it had become by 1692. The younger Updike had been around slavery his entire life and was vitally aware of the economic advantages enslaved workers would provide.[xiv]

When Richard Smith Jr. died in 1692, he was considered one of the wealthiest men in New England. The wealth and immense land holdings at Cocumscussoc were not, by then, the product of trading in furs, which had undoubtedly ended by King Philips War, and had been in decline prior to that period. When testifying on Smith Jr.'s behalf involving a land dispute in 1779, Roger Williams stated that the younger Smith "hath kept possess of his father's howsing, lands, and medoes, with great emprovement; also by his great cost and industrie.”  The Great House, known as Smith's Castle, was completed at that point after the original home was destroyed by fire. Williams was describing something much more significant than the trading post that had operated there decades before. For over a century, enslaved labor would continue to transform the landscape of Cocumscussoc into what at one time was one of the most successful agricultural operations in New England.[xv]

While slavery in New England and at Cocumscussoc never rivaled what was seen in the South, it was unfortunately common in Narragansett Country and other pockets of New England. Documentation on slavery at Cocumscussoc during the first half of the eighteenth century, much like the years before 1692, is all but nonexistent. In Daniel Updike's will of 1757, we find nineteen enslaved people listed. Just prior to the American Revolution in a Rhode Island census, eleven of the twenty-two members of the Lodowick Updike (grandson of the first Lodowick) household are Black. The last recorded enslaved Blacks at Smith’s Castle can be found in the 1800 census, which lists two “Slaves” in the household of Lodowick Updike. In close proximity to Smith’s Castle is a long-forgotten cemetery for the enslaved that goes back to the 1700s. Estimates of the number of people interred at the site have been as high as 81 and perhaps many more, indicating the significant number of enslaved at Cocumscussoc and other nearby farms held by the family.[xvi]

Unfortunately, we may never know when the first people of African descent stepped foot on the ground at Cocumscussoc. The multiple Dutch and Barbados connections to slavery in the seventeenth century cannot be ignored. Possibly Richard Smith Sr. owned some enslaved servants or farm laborers prior to his death; however, none appeared in his will. Therefore, a reasonable estimate for the first enslaved Blacks at Cocumscussoc would be sometime in the 1660s when Richard Smith Jr. and Lodowick Updike moved to Smith's Castle permanently. We know with certainty that dozens of enslaved Blacks labored at Cocumscussoc for well over one hundred years and contributed significantly to the economic success of the first plantation in Narragansett Country. An argument can easily be made that if not for the sustained activity of people of African descent at Smith's Castle, which led to a onetime highly prosperous plantation, the 344-year-old historic great house would not be with us today. While we know but a few of the names of the enslaved Blacks that labored at Cocumscussoc, they all deserve recognition for giving us the gift of Smith’s Castle. The Great House, known as Smith's Castle, remains one of the oldest existing plantation houses in New England and the United States. 


[i]  Miller, William Davis, The Narragansett Planters, The Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society, April 1933, v 43, part 1, p 54. Woodward, Carl R., Plantation in Yankeeland, p. 25.

[ii]  Updike, Daniel Berkeley, Richard Smith: First English Settler of the Narragansett Country, p. 14.

[iii]  Ibid, p. 15.

[iv]  McManus, Edgar J. A History of Negro of Negro Slavery in New York, p. 4.  Opdyck, Charles Wilson and Opdyck, Leonard Ekstein, The Op Dyck Geneology, p. 48.

[v]  Ibid, p. 7.

[vi]  Koot, Christian J., A “Dangerous Principle”: Free Trade Discourses in Barbados and the English Leeward Islands, 1650-1689, Early American Studies, Spring 2007, v 5, number 1, p. 134.

[vii]  Cranston, G. Timothy with Neil Dunay, We Were Here Too: Selected Stories of Black History in North Kingstown, pp. 65-66.

[viii]  Rhode Island State Archives, Proceedings of the General Assembly, v 1, pp. 24-25.

[ix]  McManus, p. 6.

[x] Cranston, p. 66.

[xi] Updike, pp. 87, 90-91, 94, 107.

[xii] Opdyck, p. 82.

[xiii] Collections of the Rhode Island Historical Society, v 3, p. 166.

[xiv]  Opdyck, pp. 79-80.

[xv]  Collections of the Rhode Island…, p. 167.

[xvi]  Opdyck, p.106. Cranston, p. 87. Bartlett, John Russell, Census of the Inhabitants of the Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, p. 83.

Smith’s Castle today with the Rhode Island Slave History Medallion Monument in the foreground.


Indigenous Soldiers of the Revolution and their Efforts to Obtain Pensions for their Service by Robert A. Geake

by Robert Geake in


In our book From Slaves to Soldiers, Lorén Spears and I highlighted the enlistment of indigenous people who fought in the Revolutionary War. Many of these soldiers were free men who served in both Rhode Island regiments, placed mostly among the enslaved and others recruited for the 1st Rhode Island regiment which would become famously known as the “black regiment”.

 As with all enlisted men who were not seriously wounded in the War of Independence, the pensions promised to the soldiers were long in coming, and furthermore, applications for such pensions from men of color were in some cases delayed or refused by a lack of understanding of tradition and heritage as well as racial prejudices and suspicion of fraudulent accounts and depositions. This was also true for men of the local indigenous tribes that had served, including the Narragansett people.

 By the time of the Revolutionary War, a significant number of tribal members had intermarried into the black community of enslaved people within Rhode Island, especially if they worked either as indentured servants or were descended of previous generations of enslaved workers.

 This often led to mis-identification and ultimately, the loss of identity in state records, including census records which often issued one race for a mixed-race household; in what one Narragansett historian has named “a paper-genocide” of his people[i].

 Few indigenous soldiers who served in the 1stand 2ndRhode Island Regiments applied for a pension. This may have been as Spear’s noted, that these former soldiers were not aware of the process of filing an application. Others may have forgone the process as a matter of pride, as in fighting to defend their homeland but not wishing to become beholden to a government that had forced their people onto a reservation three quarters of a century before the war began.

 Still others may have fallen prey to the legion of already wealthy “investors” who purchased pension claims from revolutionary veterans of all color who had become destitute in the difficult years after the war while waiting for Congress to determine their compensation.

Utilizing a list of indigenous soldiers compiled for our book from the DAR and Grundset’s publication of Forgotten Patriots, I found only a handful of pension applications, some of which clearly show the skeptical views of government officials as they sorted through the many pension applications that they received, indicating that indigenous veterans as with other veterans of color, often found their efforts to obtain a pension a difficult ordeal.

 An example of such scrutiny can be examined from the family of George Rutter Gardner. 

Gardner[ii]was a slave of Benjamin Gardiner when he married Thankful Babcock, a Narragansett woman on September 12, 1763. Thankful was the slave of Hezekiah Babcock of South Kingstown. Her first son Robbin Babcock, adopted the master’s last name, indicating he may have been born before her marriage to Gardner. Later children, a daughter Patience, and sons London, and Sharper took Gardner’s name. All of these children were Narragansett, based upon the tribe’s matrilineal heritage, though all were misidentified in the records. George Rutter Gardner died in South Kingstown about 1795. His widow Thankful applied for a Revolutionary War pension, detailing his service during the war.

His son Sharper Rutter Gardner was a slave of Benjamin Gardner of South Kingstown. He enlisted on February 27, 1778 and served in the 1st Rhode Island regiment as a private in Capt. John Dexter’s company. He deserted the regiment on June 1, 1781 shortly after the devastating attack on the regiment’s encampment by loyalists in New York State. He was captured on June 20, 1782 and a court martial handed down the sentence of death the following day. 

 The sentence was never carried out and Sharper Gardner was later pardoned by General Washington. He rejoined the regiment in September 1782 and served until his discharge in June 1783[iii]. He apparently died however, some time before applications were allowed to be filed.

 With the support of his siblings London and Patience, Sharper’s half-brother Robbin applied on behalf of the family the  in 1812. The pension file included testimony from Captain John L. Dexter, in whose company Sharper Gardner had served, and fellow soldiers Primus Babcock, and Prince Bento, who testified to his familiarity with the Father and son, further supporting the statement Robbin Babcock had written to authorities:

 “I was an Enlisted soldier in the American Revolutionary War and served during the same in the Rhode Island black regiment commanded by Col. Greene who was succeeded by Col. Olney in command.

 That I was there acquainted with George Utter Gardner and his son Sharper Gardner, who both enlisted into the regiment to serve during the war and did actually serve to the end…and were to my knowledge discharged therefrom, and both of whose discharges I have heard.

 I further testify that about twenty years after, the said Sharper Gardner went from this County to New York & soon after which his friends received a letter from some person in New York informing them of the death of P(rivate) Sharper, since which I have never heard of (from?) P. Sharper…and believe that he is dead. 

 I further testify that about seventeen years ago George Utter Gardner died in South Kingston in this County, leaving a widow and three children, two sons and one daughter, namely Robin, London, and Patience, which three were the only said children of George Utter Gardner…which widow is now dead and the said Sharper Gardner left no child, and no brother or sister except the said Robin, (who now labors by the name of Robin Babcock after the name of his late master Hezekiah Babcock[iv]”.

Robin Babcock eventually hired Elisha R. Potter to serve as “my true, sufficient & Lawful Attorney for me in my name & stead to ask, demand, levy, require, Recover & receive the Land Warrants which my Father George Utter Gardner and my brother Sharper Utter Gardner were intitled to as a bounty for their service in the Revolutionary War, and also to recover and receive any sum…of money as may be due to my father or brother as wages for their service in said War, and to give such discharge as the law requires in such cases…”

 In December of 1813, the Department of War ruled that the father and son had indeed served throughout the war. The remaining family members were then awarded the land grant due his relations.Narragansett John Harry served three years under Col. Greene and Col. Jeremiah Olney of the 1st Rhode Island Regiment. He is also listed as serving in Allen’s detachment from June – December 1783. Harry and his wife Mary applied for a pension for his service, as any soldier was permitted who had served at least three months with the army.

 In addition, his application supplied testimony from his acquaintance and employer Levi Totten written in 1820. Totten wrote that he had been acquainted with John Harry since 1783 at the close of the war

 “for the past three years he has been in a debilitative state of Health and unable to perform a Man’s Day’s Work, three years since I employed him and at sundry times since have employed him to labor for me…He has repeatedly shown me a wound in his side, and part of his ribs appear to be missing. I always understood that he received the wound whilst in the Revolutionary Army[v]”.

 During the investigation, an agent from the Pension Board noted that Harry and his wife were receiving income from land they had leased. This was land actually owned by Mary, and the lease of forty-two acres from 1812 had been arranged by the tribe in order to give the couple an income of twenty dollars per year, as they had become destitute. In order to clarify this issue, the tribal council submitted a copy of the agreement, as well as tribal council member 

 Augustus Harry, penning an eloquent and non-equivocating epistle to government officials:

 “I have personally known John Harry of Charlestown…who is also one of said Tribe, as long as I remember any body. I never knew him (to) own any Land or real Estate of any kind. If he had owned any, I believe it would have come to my knowledge. Since I arrived at the age of twenty-one years, I have been elected and served as a Member of the Tribal Council of said Tribe, twenty-five years, and am now a Member of said Council.

The Council of the Tribe, who are annually elected, superintend & direct the Municipal Concerns of the Tribe, according to the Customs and Usages of said Tribe, particularly the letting out and leasing of the Lands belonging to said Tribe, and of the individuals who choose to Let their Lands. The Narragansett Tribe, and the individuals thereof, hold their land in a tenure peculiar to themselves. Not as the white People hold lands. 

 An individual of said Tribe cannot sell or convey any Land descended to him or her, nor mortgage it, or charge it with Debts as white people do. But when a Member of that Tribe dies, his or her Land descends to his or her Children or next of kin, Generally without distinction of Male or Female, and if a member of the Tribe abandons their land and goes without the (e)state, the next Heirs or Heir enters & occupies it.

 Neither can a member of said Tribe lease out or let his or her land without the approbation and Signatures of a Majority of the Indian Council. Neither can a Member of the Tribe dispose of his or her land by Will as white people do.

  I further testify that John Harry…is very poor. I believe him destitute of property, quite infirm, and unable to do hard labor. He sometimes performs some light work for which he receives some Compensation, but at present is principally supported by his Children who labor for their Support. If he was not helped by his Children, he would in some Measure be Chargeable to the Tribe, who support all their own Poor.

John Harry’s wife, who is Mother of their Children holds land that is descended to her, which, if she should die, would by our Usages & Customs descend immediately to his Children. This Land, according to our Customs and with the Approbation of the Council, she lets out for her own Support. He has no control over it. 

 I further testify that her Land, except about 2 acres has lately been leased out by Approbation of the Council for seven years to enable her to have a small house erected on that 2 acres for the Residence of herself & family, and that all the Rents for said seven years appropriated to that purpose. The Council considered it necessary as John Harry, his wife & family were destitute of a house.

 Both John Harry and his Wife have nothing but their Labor to depend on for Support. She cannot receive anything from her Land until the expiration of her lease, which will not happen for six years to come, or not till, about that time. And if in the Mean time, John Harry’s wife should be sick, or become Lame, or unable to work, I know of nothing that would prevent her from becoming chargeable to the Tribe, at least until the expiration of the lease before mentioned.

 The house & 2 acre Lot I expect John & his wife now occupy; and believe it would not rent for more than ten dollars a year[vi]”. John Harry eventually received a pension of $8.00 per month on November 8, 1820[vii].

 For widows of veterans with little documentary evidence, the ordeal was even more difficult. 

Such was the case for Narragansett Bridget George, widow of John George who had enlisted in 

Charlestown, Rhode Island in 1780 and served three years in the 1st, and consolidated Rhode Island regiment. John George had applied for a pension in 1818 and had been approved for a pension of $8.00 per month. He died just two years later, leaving his wife without any income. 

 She applied for assistance from the department of war some seventeen years after his death when Congress authorized funds for widows of pensioners. Now age 79, Bridget could neither read or write, and her infirmities prevented her from attending a hearing. She was then assisted by Israel Chapman, Justice of the Court of Common Pleas, in submitting her deposition in 1837.

Her deposition is interesting reading, for while Justice Chapman seems to faithfully record her remarks, he also clearly implies that her memory might be faulty. What is one to make for instance of the following wording when recording that her husband “had then & afterwards” served  “for the duration and the then remaining period of the war, or for the period of three years, which of those periods she cannot now be certain[viii]”.

 John George had gone with the 1stRhode Island regiment to New York, and was captured in the surprise attack at the Croton River in May 1781. Chapman recorded her recollection that

“When Col Greene was Killed the said John, if she rightly remembers, was taken prisoner by the enemy, at what particular place she cannot remember & after a considerable time, the length of which she cannot remember, a prisoner; he was restored to the American Army and the time for which he had enlisted, either under Col. Olney or Col. Angell…the Captain’s name under whom the said John served, if he told her, she does not recollect.[ix]

 Moreover, Chapman informed the department “She has no evidence of the said John’s service with her claim for a pension” He also stated that the claimant “declares that she was married to the said John George in July of 1776, but the day of the month on which she was married she cannot remember[x]”, and while she recalled that they were married by Peleg Cross, a Justice of the Peace, “she has no certificate of said marriage, nor does the declarant even have (the said John’s) death certificate.[xi]

 Attempts to find her marriage certificate turned up empty, no record seems to have been filed, or it was lost. Nonetheless, she was confident that records found in the War department would find her to be truthful. Though it may seem her claim was deeply flawed,  in a postscript, her recorder indicates that he has known her for some time, and believes her entitled to a hearing. Chapman also seems to have reached out to others for testimony, and the town clerk wrote in her defense that while he could not find a record of her marriage,

 “I believe many marriages take place in the said town of Charlestown which are not recorded and for many years past taken place that were not Recorded or lodged for record…[xii]

 Narragansett women also came to her defense. Susan Henry wrote that she was well acquainted with the couple and had attended their wedding at the house of Moses Skesuck, the brother of Bridget, and a former indigenous soldier of the revolution as well. Elizabeth Primus also provided written testimony affirming the same.

 Most importantly for authorities, former Major John Dexter also provided a written testimony in which he declared that John George did

 “…faithfully serve from the time of his inlistment in the Regiment…co-commanded by Col. Christopher Greene and Lieutenant Colonel Commandant Jeremiah Olney in the Rhode Island line in the Continental Establishment until the twenty-fifth day of December 1783 when he was honorably discharged in Saratoga, New York[xiii]”.

 

Bridget George received a payment of $560.00 issued on March 4, 1838, by which time she had reached eighty years of age.


[i]In my book Keepers of the Bay: A History of the Narragansett Tribe of Rhode Island, I trace the trajectory of 19thcentury historical narratives that portrayed the tribe in the past tense in the chapter entitled The Ghosting of A People. This belief often colored, so to speak the view of the tribe and their efforts to retain their identity. As early as 1836 when Governor John Brown Francis was invited to a Pow-Wow, his hastily written memo to an aide reads “What’s this about a Pow-Wow? I thought they were all negroes now…”

[ii]Gardner’s name also appears as “George Utter Gardner/Gardiner” in several sources, but his name is spelled “George Rutter Gardner” in his record of marriage to Thankful Babcock in Hopkington town records.

[iii]Eric Grundset,  Forgotten Patriots pp. 214-215

[iv]NARA Revolutionary War Pension Files B.L. Wt. 619-100

[v]NARA M804 Revolutionary War Pension and Bounty-Land Warrant Application Files, roll 1206, p. 10

[vi]Ibid. p. 15

[vii]Ibid. p. 

[viii]NARA M804 Revolutionary War Pension and Bounty-Land Warrant Application Files, roll 1062, p. 4

[ix]Ibid. p. 5

[x]Ibid.

[xi]Ibid. p. 6

[xii]Ibid. p. 14

[xiii]Ibid. p. 13

Top: Letter of Martha Babcock, Bottom: Summary of payment to the widow of John Henry, Narragansett 1818